Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40150051›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Diagnostic Value of Comprehensive Echocardiographic Assessment Including Speckle-Tracking in Patients with Sarcoidosis Versus Healthy Controls: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Hritvik Jain, Maryam Shahzad, Muneeba Ahsan, Rahul Patel, Jagjot Singh, Ramez M Odat, Aman Goyal, Raveena Kelkar, Nishad Barve, Hina Farrukh and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Reply to 'Screening for cardiac sarcoidosis: diagnostic approach and long-term follow-up in a tertiary centre'.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hritvik JainDepartment of Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur, Jodhpur 342005, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5608-4299
Maryam ShahzadDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi 74200, Pakistan.ORCID 0009-0002-3565-8358
Muneeba AhsanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi 74200, Pakistan.
Rahul PatelDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of North Carolina Blue Ridge Hospital, Morganton, NC 28655, USA.
Jagjot SinghDepartment of Internal Medicine, Government Medical College Amritsar, Amritsar 143001, India.
Ramez M OdatDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan.
Aman GoyalDepartment of Internal Medicine, King Edward Memorial Hospital and Seth G.S. Medical College, Mumbai 400012, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8062-5657
Raveena KelkarDepartment of Internal Medicine, Wentworth-Douglass Hospital, Dover, NH 03820, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6778-014X
Nishad BarveDepartment of Internal Medicine, Lowell General Hospital, Lowell, MA 01854, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6028-3001
Hina FarrukhDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Florida Health-Central Florida, The Villages, FL 32608, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-1298-8767
Raheel AhmedDepartment of Cardiology, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

cardiac sarcoidosisdoppler echocardiographyechocardiographymeta-analysissarcoidosisspeckle tracking echocardiography

Identifiers

PMID40150051
PMCPMC11941600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.