Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40150020›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Real-World Application of Digital Morphology Analyzers: Practical Issues and Challenges in Clinical Laboratories.

Hanah Kim, Mina Hur, Giuseppe d'Onofrio, Gina Zini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. AI In Leukemia Diagnostics: Complementing the Pathologist's Role.International journal of laboratory hematology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Digital Pathology in Hematopathology: From Vision to Deployment.International journal of laboratory hematology · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hanah KimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul 05030, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3266-638X
Mina HurDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul 05030, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4429-9978
Giuseppe d'OnofrioDepartment of Hematology, Università Cattolica del S. Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Gina ZiniDepartment of Hematology, Università Cattolica del S. Cuore-Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli, 00168 Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital morphology (DM) analyzers have advanced clinical hematology laboratories by enhancing the efficiency and precision of peripheral blood (PB) smear analysis. This review explores the real-world application of DM analyzers with their benefits and challenges by focusing on PB smear analysis and less common analyses, such as bone marrow (BM) aspirates and body fluids (BFs). DM analyzers may automate blood cell classification and assessment, reduce manual effort, and provide consistent results. However, recognizing rare and dysplastic cells remains challenging due to variable algorithmic performances, which affect diagnostic reliability. The quality of blood film as well as staining techniques significantly influence the accuracy of DM analyzers, and poor-quality samples may lead to errors. In spite of reduced inter-observer variability compared with manual counting, an expert's review is still needed for complex cases with atypical cells. DM analyzers are less effective in BM aspirates and BF examinations because of their higher complexity and inconsistent sample preparation compared with PB smears. This technology relies heavily on artificial intelligence (AI)-based pre-classifications, which require extensive, well-annotated datasets for improved accuracy. The performance variation across platforms in BM aspirates and rare-cell analysis highlights the need for AI algorithm advancements and DM analysis standardization. Future clinical practice integration will likely combine advanced digital platforms with skilled oversight to enhance diagnostic workflow in hematology laboratories. Ongoing research aims to develop robust and validated AI models for broader clinical applications and to overcome the current limitations of DM analyzers. As technology evolves, DM analyzers are set to transform laboratory efficiency and diagnostic precision in hematology.

Indexed as

body fluidbone marrow aspiratesclinical laboratorydigital morphology analyzersperipheral blood smearspractical issues

Identifiers

PMID40150020
PMCPMC11941716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.