ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Real-World Application of Digital Morphology Analyzers: Practical Issues and Challenges in Clinical Laboratories.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Whole-slide imaging in hematopathology: Current state, challenges and future opportunities.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Review
- Assessment of the Performance of Siemens Scopio Digital Morphology on Bone Marrow Aspirates in Onco-Hematology.International journal of laboratory hematology · 2026Article
- AI In Leukemia Diagnostics: Complementing the Pathologist's Role.International journal of laboratory hematology · 2026Review
- Putting the I in AML: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Cells · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence for Personalized Management of Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Review
- Digital Pathology in Hematopathology: From Vision to Deployment.International journal of laboratory hematology · 2026Review
- Automated Aerospray Hematology PRO staining shows good agreement for mature leukocytes but limited diagnostic reliability for immature forms: comparison with manual May-Grünwald-Giemsa staining.Biochemia medica · 2026Article
- Comprehensive performance assessment of the BMIA-12 a system for bone marrow cell quantification in normal and hematological malignancy samples.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Deep learning in bone marrow cytomorphology: advances in segmentation, classification, and clinical translation.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital morphology (DM) analyzers have advanced clinical hematology laboratories by enhancing the efficiency and precision of peripheral blood (PB) smear analysis. This review explores the real-world application of DM analyzers with their benefits and challenges by focusing on PB smear analysis and less common analyses, such as bone marrow (BM) aspirates and body fluids (BFs). DM analyzers may automate blood cell classification and assessment, reduce manual effort, and provide consistent results. However, recognizing rare and dysplastic cells remains challenging due to variable algorithmic performances, which affect diagnostic reliability. The quality of blood film as well as staining techniques significantly influence the accuracy of DM analyzers, and poor-quality samples may lead to errors. In spite of reduced inter-observer variability compared with manual counting, an expert's review is still needed for complex cases with atypical cells. DM analyzers are less effective in BM aspirates and BF examinations because of their higher complexity and inconsistent sample preparation compared with PB smears. This technology relies heavily on artificial intelligence (AI)-based pre-classifications, which require extensive, well-annotated datasets for improved accuracy. The performance variation across platforms in BM aspirates and rare-cell analysis highlights the need for AI algorithm advancements and DM analysis standardization. Future clinical practice integration will likely combine advanced digital platforms with skilled oversight to enhance diagnostic workflow in hematology laboratories. Ongoing research aims to develop robust and validated AI models for broader clinical applications and to overcome the current limitations of DM analyzers. As technology evolves, DM analyzers are set to transform laboratory efficiency and diagnostic precision in hematology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.