ArticleBiomolecules2025
Kinetics of Circulating Progenitor Cells and Chemotactic Factors in Full-Term Neonates with Encephalopathy: Indications of Participation in the Endogenous Regenerative Process.
Article in Biomolecules, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Preclinical studies have shown that progenitor cells (PCs) are mobilized toward injured tissues to ameliorate damage and contribute to regeneration. The exogenous therapeutic administration of PCs in children affected by neonatal encephalopathy (NE) is a promising, yet underreported, topic. In this prospective study, we investigated whether endogenous circulating progenitor cells (CPCs) are involved in intrinsic regeneration mechanisms following neonatal brain injury. Thirteen full-term infants with moderate/severe NE, eleven with perinatal stress, and twelve controls were enrolled. Blood samples were collected on days 1, 3, 9, 18, and 45, as well as at 8 and 24 months of life, and were analyzed with a focus on Endothelial Progenitor Cells, Haematopoietic Stem Cells, and Very Small Embryonic-Like Stem Cells, in addition to chemotactic factors (erythropoietin, IGF-1, and SDF-1). Correlations between CPCs, chemotactic factors, and brain injury were assessed using serum levels of brain injury biomarkers (S100B and neuron-specific enolase), brain MRIs, and Bayley III developmental scores. Increased brain injury biomarkers were followed by the upregulation of SDF-1 receptor and erythropoietin and, finally, by elevated CPCs. These findings suggest a potential endogenous regenerative effort, primarily observed in the moderate encephalopathy group, but this is suppressed in cases of severe brain injury. Mimicking and enhancing endogenous regeneration pathways in cases of failure-regarding cell type and timeframe-could provide a novel therapeutic model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.