ReviewBiomolecules2025
Artificial Intelligence: A New Tool for Structure-Based G Protein-Coupled Receptor Drug Discovery.
Review in Biomolecules, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- From molecular mechanisms to digital surveillance: the 2010-2025 evolution of benzodiazepine and Z-drug misuse research.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- Navigating the uncharted: AI-driven advances in protein structure, dynamics, interactions and ligand interactions for understudied families.BioData mining · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence driven protein design and sustainable nanomedicine for advanced theranostics.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Elucidating the Structure and Activation Mechanisms of GPCRs Using Modern Computational and AI Tools.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2026Review
- AlphaFold for Docking Screens.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding protein structures can facilitate the development of therapeutic drugs. Traditionally, protein structures have been determined through experimental approaches such as X-ray crystallography, NMR spectroscopy, and cryo-electron microscopy. While these methods are effective and are considered the gold standard, they are very resource-intensive and time-consuming, ultimately limiting their scalability. However, with recent developments in computational biology and artificial intelligence (AI), the field of protein prediction has been revolutionized. Innovations like AlphaFold and RoseTTAFold enable protein structure predictions to be made directly from amino acid sequences with remarkable speed and accuracy. Despite the enormous enthusiasm associated with these newly developed AI-approaches, their true potential in structure-based drug discovery remains uncertain. In fact, although these algorithms generally predict overall protein structures well, essential details for computational ligand docking, such as the exact location of amino acid side chains within the binding pocket, are not predicted with the necessary accuracy. Additionally, docking methodologies are considered more as a hypothesis generator rather than a precise predictor of ligand-target interactions, and thus, usually identify many false-positive hits among only a few correctly predicted interactions. In this paper, we are reviewing the latest development in this cutting-edge field with emphasis on the GPCR target class to assess the potential role of AI approaches in structure-based drug discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.