Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40149959›Full record

ReviewBiomolecules2025

Artificial Intelligence: A New Tool for Structure-Based G Protein-Coupled Receptor Drug Discovery.

Jason Chung, Hyunggu Hahn, Emmanuel Flores-Espinoza, Alex R B Thomsen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomolecules, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. AlphaFold for Docking Screens.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jason ChungDepartment of Molecular Pathobiology, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, NY 10010, USA.
Hyunggu HahnDepartment of Molecular Pathobiology, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, NY 10010, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3532-7671
Emmanuel Flores-EspinozaDepartment of Molecular Pathobiology, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, NY 10010, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7889-7458
Alex R B ThomsenDepartment of Molecular Pathobiology, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, NY 10010, USA.

Funding

Spatiotemporal Regulation of GPCR Signaling by Different Beta-Arrestin ConformationsR35GM147088 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI Alex Rojas Bie Thomsen · 2022 to 2026
$2.0M
Regulation of Melanoma Cell Malignancy by Compartmentalized Chemokine Receptor SignalingR21CA243052 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI THOMSEN, ALEX ROJAS BIE · 2022 to 2022
$413k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA243052NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM147088NIH HHS 1R21CA243052-00A1NIH HHS 1R35TW147088-00A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding protein structures can facilitate the development of therapeutic drugs. Traditionally, protein structures have been determined through experimental approaches such as X-ray crystallography, NMR spectroscopy, and cryo-electron microscopy. While these methods are effective and are considered the gold standard, they are very resource-intensive and time-consuming, ultimately limiting their scalability. However, with recent developments in computational biology and artificial intelligence (AI), the field of protein prediction has been revolutionized. Innovations like AlphaFold and RoseTTAFold enable protein structure predictions to be made directly from amino acid sequences with remarkable speed and accuracy. Despite the enormous enthusiasm associated with these newly developed AI-approaches, their true potential in structure-based drug discovery remains uncertain. In fact, although these algorithms generally predict overall protein structures well, essential details for computational ligand docking, such as the exact location of amino acid side chains within the binding pocket, are not predicted with the necessary accuracy. Additionally, docking methodologies are considered more as a hypothesis generator rather than a precise predictor of ligand-target interactions, and thus, usually identify many false-positive hits among only a few correctly predicted interactions. In this paper, we are reviewing the latest development in this cutting-edge field with emphasis on the GPCR target class to assess the potential role of AI approaches in structure-based drug discovery.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDrug DiscoveryReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledHumansLigandsMolecular Docking SimulationProtein ConformationLigandsReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledAlphaFoldcomputational dockingGPCRsRoseTTAFoldstructure-based drug discoveryvirtual screening

Identifiers

PMID40149959
PMCPMC11940138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.