ReviewBiomolecules2025
The Progress and Evolving Trends in Nucleic-Acid-Based Therapies.
Review in Biomolecules, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pyroptosis as a novel therapeutic target in glioblastoma multiforme: Mechanisms, molecular insights, and therapeutic potential.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2026Review
- Article
- Synthesis of Peptide-Oligonucleotide Conjugates via Condensation of a Lysine Side-Chain with a Thioester.The Journal of organic chemistry · 2026Article
- QStrain: an interactive platform for viral genome analysis and nucleic acid therapeutic design.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Review
- Nuclear receptors in metabolic, inflammatory, and oncologic diseases: mechanisms, therapeutic advances, and future directions.European journal of medical research · 2025Review
- Orphan Nuclear Receptors TR2 and TR4 in Erythropoiesis: From Mechanisms to Therapies.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Small nucleic acid drugs-the dawn of functional cure of chronic hepatitis B.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nucleic-acid-based therapies have emerged as a pivotal domain within contemporary biomedical science, marked by significant advancements in recent years. These innovative treatments primarily operate through the precise binding of DNA or RNA molecules to discrete target genes, subsequently suppressing the expression of the target proteins. The spectrum of nucleic-acid-based therapies encompasses antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs), small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), microRNAs (miRNAs), and messenger RNAs (mRNAs), etc. Compared to more traditional medicinal approaches, nucleic-acid-based therapies stand out for their highly targeted action on specific genes, as well as their potential for chemical modification to improve resistance to nucleases, ensuring sustained therapeutic activity and mitigating immunogenicity concerns. Nevertheless, these molecules' limited cellular permeability necessitates the deployment of delivery vectors to enhance their intracellular uptake and stability. As nucleic-acid-based therapies progressively display promising pharmacodynamic profiles, there has been a burgeoning interest in these treatments for applications in clinical research. This review aims to summarize the variety of nucleic acid drugs and their mechanisms, evaluate the present status in research and application, discourse on prospective trends, and potential challenges ahead. These innovative therapeutics are anticipated to assume a pivotal role in the management of a wide array of diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.