Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40149768›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2025

Improving Stuttering Through Augmented Multisensory Feedback Stimulation.

Giovanni Muscarà, Alessandra Vergallito, Valentina Letorio, Gaia Iannaccone, Martina Giardini, Elena Randaccio, Camilla Scaramuzza, Cristina Russo, Maria Giovanna Scarale, Jubin Abutalebi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Giovanni MuscaràVivavoce Medical Center, 20124 Milan, Italy.
Alessandra VergallitoVivavoce Research Department, 20124 Milan, Italy.
Valentina LetorioVivavoce Medical Center, 20124 Milan, Italy.
Gaia IannacconeVivavoce Medical Center, 20124 Milan, Italy.
Martina GiardiniVivavoce Medical Center, 20124 Milan, Italy.
Elena RandaccioVivavoce Medical Center, 20124 Milan, Italy.
Camilla ScaramuzzaVivavoce Research Department, 20124 Milan, Italy.
Cristina RussoVivavoce Research Department, 20124 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8493-4972
Maria Giovanna ScaraleUniversity Centre of Statistics in the Biomedical Sciences (CUSSB), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1769-6246
Jubin AbutalebiVivavoce Medical Center, 20124 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3016-9184

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesStuttering is a speech disorder involving fluency disruptions like repetitions, prolongations, and blockages, often leading to emotional distress and social withdrawal. Here, we present Augmented Multisensory Feedback Stimulation (AMFS), a novel personalized intervention to improve speech fluency in people who stutter (PWS). AMFS includes a five-day intensive phase aiming at acquiring new skills, plus a reinforcement phase designed to facilitate the transfer of these skills across different contexts and their automatization into effortless behaviors. The concept of our intervention derives from the prediction of the neurocomputational model Directions into Velocities of Articulators (DIVA). The treatment applies dynamic multisensory stimulation to disrupt PWS' maladaptive over-reliance on sensory feedback mechanisms, promoting the emergence of participants'

methodsForty-six PWS and a control group, including twenty-four non-stuttering individuals, participated in this study. Stuttering severity and physiological measures, such as heart rate and electromyographic activity, were recorded before and after the intensive phase and during the reinforcement stage in the PWS but only once in the controls.

resultsThe results showed a significant reduction in stuttering severity at the end of the intensive phase, which was maintained during the reinforcement training. Crucially, worse performance was found in PWS than in the controls at baseline but not after the intervention. In the PWS, physiological signals showed a reduction in activity during the training phases compared to baseline.

conclusionsOur findings show that AMFS provides a promising approach to enhancing speech fluency. Future studies should clarify the mechanisms underlying such intervention and assess whether effects persist after the treatment conclusion.

Indexed as

DIVA modelfluency enhancementpersonalized interventionsensory feedbackstuttering

Identifiers

PMID40149768
PMCPMC11939842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.