Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40149743›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2025

Effects of Packet Loss on Neural Decoding Effectiveness in Wireless Transmission.

Jiaqi Zheng, Yuan Li, Liangliang Chen, Fei Wang, Boxuan Gu, Qixiang Sun, Xiang Gao, Fan Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jiaqi ZhengCollege of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China.
Yuan LiCollege of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China.
Liangliang ChenCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310007, China.
Fei WangCollege of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China.
Boxuan GuCollege of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4397-8773
Qixiang SunCollege of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China.
Xiang GaoCollege of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3335-6620
Fan ZhouCollege of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China.

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation under Grant Number 2024M752811Key Agricultural and Social Development Projects of Hangzhou 202204A09National Key R&D Program of China 2021ZD0200405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn brain-computer interfaces, neural decoding plays a central role in translating neural signals into meaningful physical actions. These signals are transmitted to processors for decoding via wired or wireless channels; however, they are often subject to data loss, commonly referred to as "packet loss". Despite their importance, the effects of different types and degrees of packet loss on neural decoding have not yet been comprehensively studied. Understanding these effects is critical for advancing neural signal processing.

methodsThis study addresses this gap by constructing four distinct packet loss models that simulate the congestion, distribution, and burst loss scenarios. Using macaque superior arm movement decoding experiments, we analyzed the effects of the aforementioned packet loss types on decoding performance across six parameters (position, velocity, and acceleration in the x and y dimensions). The performance was assessed using the R2 metric and statistical comparisons across different loss scenarios.

resultsOur results indicate that sudden, consecutive packet loss significantly degraded decoding performance. For the same packet loss probability, burst loss led to the largest decrease in the R2 value. Notably, when the packet loss rate reached 10%, the decoding performance for acceleration dropped to 73% of the original R2 value. On the other hand, when the packet loss rate was within 2%, the neural signal decoding results across all packet loss models remained largely unaffected. However, as the packet loss rate increased, the impact became more pronounced. These findings highlight the varying degrees to which different packet loss models affect decoding outcomes.

conclusionsThis study quantitatively evaluated the relationship between packet loss and neural decoding outcomes, highlighting the differential effects of loss patterns on decoding parameters, and it proposed some methods and devices to solve the problem of packet loss. These findings offer valuable insights for the development of resilient neural signal acquisition and processing systems capable of mitigating the impact of packet loss.

Indexed as

Gilbert–Elliott modelneural decodingpacket loss

Identifiers

PMID40149743
PMCPMC11940804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.