ReviewBiomedicines2025
3D Printing of Hydrogel Polysaccharides for Biomedical Applications: A Review.
Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multifunctional 3D-Printed Alginate Emulgel Patches Incorporating Plant Extracts for Potential Burn Wound Applications.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- 3D Printing with Marine Gelatin: A Cross-Sector Review of Biomedical, Food, and Health Uses.Marine drugs · 2026Review
- Thiolated Polymers in 3D Bioprinting: Control of Gelation.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Review
- Anionic Polysaccharides: Promising 3D Bioink Candidates for Tissue Engineering.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Scoping Review of the Biomedical Investigations of Cellulose Nanocrystal-Based Hydrogels: A Critical Analysis of Current Evidence, Research Gaps and Future Perspectives.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Collagen-Inducing Compounds from Chihuahuan Desert Plants for Potential Skin Bioink 3D Printing Applications: A Narrative Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Shape memory hydrogels in tissue engineering: Recent advances and challenges.Bioactive materials · 2025Review
- Plant-Based Polysaccharide Gums as Sustainable Bio-Polymers: Focus on Tragacanth Gum and Its Emerging Applications.Polymers · 2025Review
- Personalized Vaginal Drug Delivery through 3D Printing: Techniques, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2025Review
- Hydrogel Design Based on Bacterial Exopolysaccharides: The Biomedical Promise of Levan.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Multifunctional Nanomaterial-Integrated Hydrogels for Sustained Drug Delivery: From Synthesis and Characterization to Biomedical Application.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- In Situ Synthesis of Non-Cytotoxic Tellurium Nanoparticle and Methacrylate Photopolymer Resin Composite with Antibacterial Activity.Polymers · 2025Article
- Emerging Biomedical Applications of Sustainable Cellulose Nanocrystal-Incorporated Hydrogels: A Scoping Review.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Advances in Cryopreservation Strategies for 3D Biofabricated Constructs: From Hydrogels to Bioprinted Tissues.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Additive manufacturing, also known as 3D printing, is becoming more and more popular because of its wide range of materials and flexibility in design. Layer by layer, 3D complex structures can be generated by the revolutionary computer-aided process known as 3D bioprinting. It is particularly crucial for youngsters and elderly patients and is a useful tool for tailored pharmaceutical therapy. A lot of research has been carried out recently on the use of polysaccharides as matrices for tissue engineering and medication delivery. Still, there is a great need to create affordable, sustainable bioink materials with high-quality mechanical, viscoelastic, and thermal properties as well as biocompatibility and biodegradability. The primary biological substances (biopolymers) chosen for the bioink formulation are proteins and polysaccharides, among the several resources utilized for the creation of such structures. These naturally occurring biomaterials give macromolecular structure and mechanical qualities (biomimicry), are generally compatible with tissues and cells (biocompatibility), and are harmonious with biological digesting processes (biodegradability). However, the primary difficulty with the cell-laden printing technique (bioprinting) is the rheological characteristics of these natural-based bioinks. Polysaccharides are widely used because they are abundant and reasonably priced natural polymers. Additionally, they serve as excipients in formulations for pharmaceuticals, nutraceuticals, and cosmetics. The remarkable benefits of biological polysaccharides-biocompatibility, biodegradability, safety, non-immunogenicity, and absence of secondary pollution-make them ideal 3D printing substrates. The purpose of this publication is to examine recent developments and challenges related to the 3D printing of stimuli-responsive polysaccharides for site-specific medication administration and tissue engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.