ArticleGenes2025
Identification of a Homozygous Variant in the
Article in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesCongenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) is an autosomal recessive disorder caused by mutations in the
methodsWe performed a NIPT, which showed a 46, XX genotype, confirmed by karyotype on the newborn's DNA extracted lymphocytes. For clinical suspicion of CAH, we performed reverse dot blot and Multiple Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) of the
resultsReverse dot blot and MLPA detected the presence of the c.290-13A/C>G (I2 splice) mutation in heterozygosity in the parents and in homozygosity in the child, respectively. NGS detected the c.290-13A/C>G (I2splice) mutation in cell-free fetal DNA (cfDNA) in mother's plasma with a variant allele frequency (VAF) of 67% with a fetal fraction (FF) of 5%. This latter suggests the presence of the variant both in the mother and in newborn cfDNA.
conclusionsThe study reinforces the hypothesis that cfDNA can be used to identify point mutations, small insertions and/or deletions for the diagnosis of monogenic diseases, reducing the number of invasive tests and the risk of early miscarriages. Early detection of mutations in genes causing sexual development disorders could make it possible to start therapy in the womb.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.