ArticleCancers2025
Diagnostic Performance of Combined Conventional CT Imaging Features and Radiomics Signature in Differentiating Grade 1 Tumors from Higher-Grade Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A bibliometric analysis of the 100 most cited radiology papers on pancreatic diseases (1990-Present).Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Gastroduodenal artery aneurysm simulating a pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm: an important pitfall and potential misdiagnosis.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesAccurate identification of grade 1 (G1) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) is crucial due to their rising incidence and emerging nonsurgical management strategies. This study evaluated whether combining conventional CT imaging features, CT radiomics features, and clinical data improves differentiation of G1 PanNETs from higher-grade tumors (G2/G3 PanNETs and pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas [PanNECs]) compared to using these features individually.
methodsA retrospective analysis included 133 patients with pathologically confirmed PanNETs or PanNECs (70 males, 63 females; mean age, 58.5 years) who underwent pancreas protocol CT. A total of 28 conventional imaging features, 4892 radiomics features, and clinical data (age, gender, and tumor location) were analyzed using a support vector machine (SVM) model. Data were divided into 70% training and 30% testing sets.
resultsThe SVM model using the top 10 conventional imaging features (e.g., suspicious lymph nodes and hypoattenuating tumors) achieved 75% sensitivity, 81% specificity, and 79% accuracy for identifying higher-grade tumors (G2/G3 PanNETs and PanNECs). The top 10 radiomics features yielded 94% sensitivity, 46% specificity, and 69% accuracy. Combining all features (imaging, radiomics, and clinical data) improved performance, with 94% sensitivity, 69% specificity, 79% accuracy, and an F1-score of 0.77. The radiomics score demonstrated an AUC of 0.85 in the training and 0.83 in the testing set.
conclusionsConventional imaging features provided higher specificity, while radiomics offered greater sensitivity for identifying higher-grade tumors. Integrating all three features improved diagnostic accuracy, highlighting their complementary roles. This combined model may serve as a valuable tool for distinguishing higher-grade tumors from G1 PanNETs and potentially guiding patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.