ReviewCancers2025
Optimizing Surgical Management of Anterior Skull Base Meningiomas: Imaging Modalities, Key Surgical Considerations, and Risk Mitigation Strategies.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microsurgical resection of anterior clinoidal meningiomas with arterial engulfment: lessons from 2 contrasting cases.Neurosurgical focus: Video · 2026Article
- Endoscopic endonasal approach for tuberculum sellae meningioma with optic canal involvement: standard technique for optimal visual outcomes.Neurosurgical focus: Video · 2026Article
- Pre-operative visualization of cerebral vasculature using photon-counting CT ultra-high resolution pure lumen imaging.Brain & spine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skull base meningiomas present considerable challenges in surgical management due to their proximity to critical neurovascular structures. Anterior skull base meningiomas encompass olfactory groove, supra- and parasellar, anterior sphenoid ridge, cavernous sinus, and spheno-orbital tumors. The success of surgical resection and the likelihood of complications are influenced by several key factors, including the presence of an intact arachnoid plane, tumor size and consistency, peritumoral brain edema, cranial nerve involvement, vascular encasement, and invasion of critical areas such as the optic canal or cavernous sinus. These factors not only affect the feasibility of gross total resection but also play a pivotal role in determining functional outcomes and postoperative recovery. With the vast array of imaging modalities available, selecting the most appropriate investigations to assess these parameters and tailoring surgical strategies accordingly remain complex tasks. This review examines the critical surgical parameters, identifies the most effective imaging modalities for evaluating each, and provides key insights into how this analysis can guide surgical decision-making, mitigate risks, and minimize complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.