Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40149299›Full record

ArticleCancers2025

Deep Learning Models Based on Pretreatment MRI and Clinicopathological Data to Predict Responses to Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Zhan Xu, Zijian Zhou, Jong Bum Son, Haonan Feng, Beatriz E Adrada, Tanya W Moseley, Rosalind P Candelaria, Mary S Guirguis, Miral M Patel, Gary J Whitman and 18 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02276443 (ARTEMIS), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02276443 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

ARTEMIS: A Robust TNBC Evaluation FraMework to Improve Survival

TypeinterventionalSponsorM.D. Anderson Cancer CenterRan2015 to 2026Enrolled798ConditionsInvasive Breast Carcinoma, Stage I Breast Cancer AJCC v7, Stage IA Breast Cancer AJCC v7, Stage IB Breast Cancer AJCC v7ArmsChemotherapy, Immunotherapy, Laboratory Biomarker Analysis, Lymph Node Biopsy, Ultrasonography
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Zhan XuDepartment of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5892-0227
Zijian ZhouDepartment of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Jong Bum SonDepartment of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Haonan FengDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Beatriz E AdradaDepartment of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5539-5332
Tanya W MoseleyDepartment of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Rosalind P CandelariaDepartment of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7897-7896
Mary S GuirguisDepartment of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Miral M PatelDepartment of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Gary J WhitmanDepartment of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2002-7457
Jessica W T LeungDepartment of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2232-2134
Huong T C Le-PetrossDepartment of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0356-498X
Rania M MohamedDepartment of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6487-3965
Bikash PanthiDepartment of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Deanna L LaneDepartment of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Huiqin ChenDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Peng WeiDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Debu TripathyDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5711-2404
Jennifer K LittonDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Vicente ValeroDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Lei HuoDepartment of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Kelly K HuntDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9156-8723
Anil KorkutDepartment of Bioinformatics & Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Alastair ThompsonSection of Breast Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 7200 Cambridge St., Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Wei YangDepartment of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Clinton YamDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Gaiane M RauchDepartment of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Jingfei MaDepartment of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2827-8891

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
CPRIT RP240293NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop deep learning models for predicting the pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) based on pretreatment multiparametric breast MRI and clinicopathological data.

methodsThe prospective institutional review board-approved study [NCT02276443] included 282 patients with stage I-III TNBC who had multiparametric breast MRI at baseline and underwent NAST and surgery during 2016-2021. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and clinicopathological data were used for the model development and internal testing. Data from the I-SPY 2 trial (2010-2016) were used for external testing. Four variables with a potential impact on model performance were systematically investigated: 3D model frameworks, tumor volume preprocessing, tumor ROI selection, and data inputs.

resultsForty-eight models with different variable combinations were investigated. The best-performing model in the internal testing dataset used DCE, DWI, and clinicopathological data with the originally contoured tumor volume, the tight bounding box of the tumor mask, and ResNeXt50, and achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.60-0.88). The best-performing models in the external testing dataset achieved an AUC of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.57-0.84) using only DCE images (originally contoured tumor volume, enlarged bounding box of tumor mask, and ResNeXt50) and an AUC of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.56-0.86) using only DWI images (originally contoured tumor volume, enlarged bounding box of tumor mask, and ResNet18).

conclusionsWe developed 3D deep learning models based on pretreatment data that could predict pCR to NAST in TNBC patients.

Indexed as

deep learningpathological complete responsepretreatment predictiontransfer learningtriple-negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID40149299
PMCPMC11940201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.