Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40149292›Full record

ArticleCancers2025

Association Between Suicidal Ideation and Cancer Screening Uptake: Results from Middle-Aged and Older Adults in Korea.

Seong-Uk Baek, Jin-Ha Yoon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Seong-Uk BaekGraduate School, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0882-8326
Jin-Ha YoonDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCompliance with cancer screening guidelines is crucial for the early diagnosis and prevention of cancer. We explored the association of suicidal ideation with participation in cancer screening programs.

methodsThis cross-sectional analysis included a nationwide sample consisting of 22,554 Korean adults (9667 men and 12,887 women). Suicidal ideation in the past year was self-reported (yes or no). Participation in gastric, colorectal, cervical, and breast cancer screening within the past 2 years was assessed. Logistic regression models were employed to determine the association of suicidal ideation with participation in each cancer screening test. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated.

resultsAmong men, the participation rates in gastric and colorectal cancer screening were 47.6% and 39.7%, respectively. Among women, the participation rates in gastric, colorectal, cervical, and breast cancer screening were 47.1%, 34.8%, 44.3%, and 50.8%, respectively. In the male sample, suicidal ideation was associated with reduced participation in gastric cancer screening (OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.69-0.99) and colorectal cancer screening (OR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.67-1.00). Similarly, in the female sample, suicidal ideation was inversely associated with participation in gastric (OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.67-0.82), colorectal (OR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.62-0.81), cervical (OR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.68-0.84), and breast cancer screening (OR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.68-0.84).

conclusionsThis study suggests that individuals with suicidal ideation demonstrated reduced participation in cancer screening tests. This study highlights the need for targeted support to improve access to cancer screening programs for individuals with mental health problems.

Indexed as

cancer preventionhealth behaviorhealth screeningmental health

Identifiers

PMID40149292
PMCPMC11940565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.