ArticleCancers2025
Development of a miRNA-Based Model for Lung Cancer Detection.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning approaches for cancer prognosis and diagnosis via non-coding RNA: a comprehensive review.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Clinical significance of miRNAs and exosomal miRNAs in non-small cell lung cancer: diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic perspectives.Journal of human genetics · 2026Review
- Current Clinical Perspectives of Biomarkers in Respiratory Diseases: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Blood-Based miRNA Panels for Timely Detection of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: From Biomarker Discovery to Clinical Translation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- A robust machine learning model based on ribosomal-subunit-derived piRNAs for diagnostic potential of nonsmall cell lung cancer across multicentre, large-scale of sequencing data.Clinical and translational medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally, with late-stage diagnoses contributing to poor survival rates. While lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has proven effective in reducing mortality among heavy smokers, its limitations, including high false-positive rates and resource intensiveness, restrict widespread use. Liquid biopsy, particularly using microRNA (miRNA) biomarkers, offers a promising adjunct to current screening strategies. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive power of a panel of serum miRNA biomarkers for lung cancer detection. PATIENTS AND
methodsA case-control study was conducted at two tertiary hospitals, enrolling 82 lung cancer cases and 123 controls. We performed an extensive literature review to shortlist 25 candidate miRNAs, of which 16 showed a significant two-fold increase in expression compared to the controls. Machine learning techniques, including Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbors, Neural Networks, and Support Vector Machines, were employed to identify the top six miRNAs. We then evaluated predictive models, incorporating these biomarkers with lung nodule characteristics on LDCT.
resultsA prediction model utilising six miRNA biomarkers (mir-196a, mir-1268, mir-130b, mir-1290, mir-106b and mir-1246) alone achieved area under the curve (AUC) values ranging from 0.78 to 0.86, with sensitivities of 70-78% and specificities of 73-85%. Incorporating lung nodule size significantly improved model performance, yielding AUC values between 0.96 and 0.99, with sensitivities of 92-98% and specificities of 93-98%.
conclusionsA prediction model combining serum miRNA biomarkers and nodule size showed high predictive power for lung cancer. Integration of the prediction model into current lung cancer screening protocols may improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.