ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Entropy of Volatility Changes: Novel Method for Assessment of Regularity in Volatility Time Series.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Informational Content of the VIX Index: Dynamic Entropy Approach.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Information-Theoretic ESG Index Direction Forecasting: A Complexity-Aware Framework.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The goal of this research is to introduce and thoroughly investigate a new methodology for the assessment of sequential regularity in volatility time series. Three volatility estimators based on daily range data are analyzed: (1) the Parkinson estimator, (2) the Garman-Klass estimator, and (3) the Rogers-Satchell estimator. To measure the level of complexity of time series, the modified Shannon entropy based on symbol-sequence histograms is utilized. Discretization of the time series of volatility changes into a sequence of symbols is performed using a novel encoding procedure with two thresholds. Five main stock market indexes are analyzed. The whole sample covers the period from January 2017 to December 2023 (seven years). To check the robustness of our empirical findings, two sub-samples of equal length are investigated: (1) the pre-COVID-19 period from January 2017 to February 2020 and (2) the COVID-19 pandemic period from March 2020 to April 2023. An additional formal statistical analysis of the symbol-sequence histograms is conducted. The empirical results for all volatility estimators and stock market indexes are homogeneous and confirm that the level of regularity (in terms of sequential patterns) in the time series of daily volatility changes is high, independently of the choice of sample period. These results are important for academics and practitioners since the existence of regularity in the time series of volatility changes implies the possibility of volatility prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.