ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Multilabel Classification for Entry-Dependent Expert Selection in Distributed Gaussian Processes.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
By distributing the training process, local approximation reduces the cost of the standard Gaussian process. An ensemble method aggregates predictions from local Gaussian experts, each trained on different data partitions, under the assumption of perfect diversity among them. While this assumption ensures tractable aggregation, it is frequently violated in practice. Although ensemble methods provide consistent results by modeling dependencies among experts, they incur a high computational cost, scaling cubically with the number of experts. Implementing an expert-selection strategy reduces the number of experts involved in the final aggregation step, thereby improving efficiency. However, selection approaches that assign a fixed set of experts to each data point cannot account for the unique properties of individual data points. This paper introduces a flexible expert-selection approach tailored to the characteristics of individual data points. To achieve this, we frame the selection task as a multi-label classification problem in which experts define the labels, and each data point is associated with specific experts. We discuss in detail the prediction quality, efficiency, and asymptotic properties of the proposed solution. We demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed method through extensive numerical experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets. This strategy is easily extendable to distributed learning scenarios and multi-agent models, regardless of Gaussian assumptions regarding the experts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.