ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Quantitative Analysis of Trade Position Shifts of China and the United States in the Indian Ocean Rim Trade Networks Using a Weighted Centrality Approach.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Indian Ocean Rim (IOR) is a crucial hub for global commerce, possessing key maritime corridors and competitive markets for China and the United States. Assessing the evolving positions of China and the United States in regional trade provides critical insights into their economic competition. This study quantitatively investigated their changing positions in the IOR trade networks from 1992 to 2020 through an interdisciplinary approach combining the Fisher optimal segmentation, chord-diagram visualization, and five weighted centrality indicators, including two advanced metrics derived from physical current flow theory. The results reveal a significant shift in their trade positions in the IOR trade networks across four phases (1992-2002, 2003-2008, 2009-2014, and 2015-2020); in particular, the United States occupied a dominant position in the IOR trade networks until 2008, after which China rose to the central trading position, as reflected in its top ranking across four weighted indicators (excluding weighted authority centrality). In machinery and transport equipment (SITC7), China also surpassed the United States in 2008 and further consolidated its supremacy, driven by its strong manufacturing capabilities and the growing demand from the IOR countries. Meanwhile, the United States experienced a noticeable decline but maintained substantial influence as a key importer. This research develops a quantitative framework that integrates the temporal segmentation with weighted centrality indicators to provide insights into the dynamics and structural changes of trade networks across sectors and regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.