Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40149158›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Information and Knowledge Diffusion Dynamics in Complex Networks with Independent Spreaders.

Yan Zhuang, Weihua Li, Yang Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yan ZhuangSchool of Economics and Management, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
Weihua LiLMIB, NLSDE, BDBC, and School of Artificial Intelligence, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
Yang LiuCommunist Youth League Committee, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4778-9566

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 62141605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Information and knowledge diffusion are important dynamical processes in complex social systems, in which the underlying topology of interactions among individuals is often modeled as networks. Recent studies have examined various information diffusion scenarios primarily focusing on the dynamics within one network; yet, relatively little scholarly attention has been paid to possible interactions among individuals beyond the focal network. Here, in this study, we account for this phenomenon by modeling the information diffusion dynamics with the involvement of independent spreaders in a susceptible-exposed-infectious-recovered contagion process. Independent spreaders receive information using latent information transmission pathways without following the links in the focal network and can spread the information to remote areas of the network not well connected to the major components. We derive the mathematics of the critical epidemic thresholds on homogeneous and heterogeneous networks as a function of the infectious rate, exposure rate, recovery rate and the activeness of independent spreaders. We present simulation results on Small World and Scale-Free complex networks, and real-world social networks of Facebook artists and physicist collaborations. The result shows that the extent to which information or knowledge can spread might be more extensive than we can explain in terms of link contagion only. In addition, these results also help to explain how the activeness of independent spreaders can affect the diffusion process of information and knowledge in complex networks, which may have implications for studies exploring other dynamical processes.

Indexed as

complex networksepidemic modelsinformation diffusioninnovationknowledge diffusionthreshold

Identifiers

PMID40149158
PMCPMC11940925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.