ArticleBMC psychology2025
Family-centered online positive psychological intervention for breast cancer patients and family caregivers: a single-arm pre-post study of feasibility and preliminary effects.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preferences for electronic health information support concerning chemotherapy adverse reactions among young and middle-aged breast cancer patients based on the Kano model.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Effects of positive psychological intervention on psychosocial adjustment in childbearing-age patients with breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer patients and their family caregivers would experience positive changes after diagnosed. We aimed to construct an online positive psychological intervention program for breast cancer patients and their caregivers and evaluate its feasibility and preliminary effects on positive psychological experience and quality of life.
methodsA single-arm pretest and posttest quasi-experimental design was used in this study. Thirty-five dyads of chemotherapeutic breast cancer patients and caregivers were recruited. Four modules of online positive psychological interventions were developed, each lasting 20-30 min. Participants received a 4-week online positive psychological intervention during chemotherapy. Feasibility was assessed, including the rates of enrollment, retention, adherence and acceptability. Resilience, hope, perceived benefit, positive aspects of caregiving, and quality of life were assessed as the preliminary effects of the intervention. 62.5% of recruited individuals participated in the intervention. The mean number of watching modules was 2.8 ± 0.8 for breast cancer patients and 2.6 ± 0.8 for caregivers. 52.2% of patients and 47.8% of caregivers watched three modules in the intervention. For the loving-kindness meditation practice, 34.8% of patients practiced for 15 to 21 days and 52.2% of caregivers practiced for < 7 days. For the three good things practice, 56.5% of patients and 47.8% of caregivers practiced for 7 to 14 days. Mean scores on the acceptable scale for patients and caregivers were 27.61 ± 3.71 and 25.91 ± 3.01, respectively. The results of a linear mixed model showed that the preliminary effects of the intervention on participants' resilience, hope, perceived benefits, positive aspects of caregiving, and quality of life were significant (p < 0.05).
conclusionsThe online positive psychological interventions for breast cancer patients and family caregivers are feasible, and has significant preliminary effects on participants' resilience, hope, perceived benefits, positive aspects of caregiving, and quality of life, however, the effects warrant further randomized controlled trials.
trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) ChiCTR2300072809. Registered on 26 June 2023Retrospectively registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.