ArticleJournal of biomedical semantics2025
Semantics in action: a guide for representing clinical data elements with SNOMED CT.
Article in Journal of biomedical semantics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving Accessibility and Usability of Clinical Data for the Swiss Personalized Health Network: Development and Usability Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Are Traditional Registries Becoming Obsolete in the Modern Digital Health Ecosystem?Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Extended Grammar of Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine - Clinical Terms for Semantic Representation of Clinical Data: Methodological Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical data is abundant, but meaningful reuse remains lacking. Semantic representation using SNOMED CT can improve research, public health, and quality of care. However, the lack of applied guidelines to industrialise the process hinders sustainability and reproducibility. This work describes a guide for semantic representation of data elements with SNOMED CT, addressing challenges encountered during its application. The representation of the institutional data warehouse started with the guidelines proposed by SNOMED International and other groups. However, the application at large scale of manual expert-driven representation led to the development of additional rules.
resultsAn eight-rule step-by-step guide was developed iteratively through focus groups. Continuously refined by usage and growing coverage, they are tested in practice to ensure they achieve the desired outcome. All rules prioritize maintaining semantic accuracy, which is the main goal of our strategy. They are divided into four groups which apply to understanding the data correctly (Context), and to using SNOMED CT properly (Single concepts first, Approved post-coordination, Extending post-coordination).
conclusionsThis work provides a practical framework for semantic representation using SNOMED CT, enabling greater accuracy and consistency by promoting a common method. While addressing challenges of large-scale implementation, the guide supports the drive from data centric models to a semantic centric approach, leveraging interoperability and more effective reuse of clinical data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.