Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40148978›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Evaluation of comprehensive abortion care service in University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital in Northwest Ethiopia: mixed case study design.

Birtukan Demis Getaneh, Nigusu Worku, Kaleb Assegid Demissie, Tesfahun Zemene Tafere, Melak Jejaw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Strengthening health system capacity for legal termination of pregnancy in Burkina Faso: A quasi-experimental evaluation in public health facilities.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Birtukan Demis GetanehKemissie General hospital, Wollo, Amhara, Ethiopia.
Nigusu WorkuDepartment of Health Systems and Policy, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Kaleb Assegid DemissieDepartment of Health Systems and Policy, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Tesfahun Zemene TafereDepartment of Health Systems and Policy, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Melak JejawDepartment of Health Systems and Policy, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia. Melak4903@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite Ethiopia's substantial progress in comprehensive abortion care, the consequences of abortion remain a major public health challenge. This study aimed to assess the implementation status and its determinants of comprehensive abortion care service at University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital. A facility-based single case study with convergent parallel mixed-method evaluation was conducted from March 28 to April 28, 2023. Availability, patient-centered care, timeliness, and compliance dimensions with 35 indicators were used. A total of 379 exit interviews, five key informant interviews, six in-depth interviews, 411 medical charts reviewed, and 17 observations were done. Stata version 17 was used. Binary logistic regression analysis was computed to identify eligible variables for the multivariable logistic regression, and a variable with p-value < 0.05 at adjusted odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval was declared as statistically significant. The qualitative data were recorded through a tape recorder, transcribed in Amharic and translated to English, and analyzed thematically.The overall implementation status of comprehensive abortion care (CAC) was found to be 65.1%, which is considered fair according to judgment parameters. Availability of CAC resources, compliance of service providers, timeliness, and patient-centered care contributed scores of 85.7% (very good), 72.6% (fair), 40.6% (poor), and 61.3% (fair), respectively. Urban dwellers, married women, had family support, privacy to access abortion care, and those who communicated on medication were positive predictors of patient-centered care. There were stock outs of essential emergency drugs, shortages of equipment and trained manpower, and poor infrastructure. Besides, none of the providers comply with hand washing protocols and used personal protective equipment, and there were delays in providing abortion services. The overall CAC program service implementation needs urgent improvements, especially in timeliness, which was notably poor and needs major enhancements. Thus, to improve CAC services, the hospital should ensure the availability of essential drugs, equipment, and infrastructure. The Ministry of health should improver providers' compliance with CAC guidelines by providing training and enhancing continuous professional development programs. Moreover, policymakers and planners should focus on enhancing providers' communication skills and family involvement in care decisions, and warranting patient privacy and confidentiality according to established protocols.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedComprehensive Health CareHospitals, SpecialAdultEthiopiaFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHospitals, UniversityHumansInterviews as TopicPatient-Centered CarePregnancyQualitative ResearchYoung AdultAvailabilityCAC serviceCompliancePatient-centered careTimeliness

Identifiers

PMID40148978
PMCPMC11948649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.