ArticleBMC health services research2025
A national survey of osteopaths' conceptions of practice in France: structural validity of the Osteo-TAQfr and the tendency toward technical rationality.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite the growing popularity of osteopathy in France, little is known about how French osteopaths conceptualise key aspects of their practice, including skills, knowledge, and decision-making. This study aimed to adapt and validate the Osteopaths' Therapeutic Approaches Questionnaire (Osteo-TAQ) for use in a French osteopathic population (Osteo-TAQfr) and to examine the professional profile and core elements of clinical practice among French osteopaths. The first objective was to establish the psychometric properties of the Osteo-TAQfr within a French osteopathic population. The second aim was to explore French osteopaths' conceptions of practice and their approach to patient care, thereby contributing to a broader understanding of the profession in France and its relevance within the discourse on allied health professions (AHPs).
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted to (1) adapt and validate the French version of the Osteopaths' Therapeutic Approaches Questionnaire (Osteo-TAQfr) and (2) explore osteopaths' conceptions of practice in France. The translation and cultural adaptation process was informed by cognitive interviews to ensure linguistic and contextual appropriateness. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was performed to assess the factor structure in the French osteopathic context and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used to test the validity of previously established constructs-Professional Artistry (PA) and Technical Rationality (TR). Internal consistency was evaluated using McDonald's omega (ω).
resultsThe survey yielded 1,703 complete responses. Analysis supported a two-factor model with PA andTR subscales, both showing strong reliability estimations (PA ω = 0.882; TR ω = 0.873). Minor theory-informed adjustments improved model fit. A moderate negative correlation was observed between the PA and TR subscales (r=-0.407). Respondents with additional health professions qualifications scored lower on the PA subscale and higher on the TR subscale.
conclusionsThe Osteo-TAQfr is an original tool that assesses conceptions of osteopathic practice in France. Findings reveal a predominance of TR among French osteopaths, characterised by biomedical, technique-driven approaches. These results have significant implications for aligning osteopathic education and practice with contemporary AHP paradigms, including patient-centred care and interdisciplinary collaboration. Further research should explore the transferability of the Osteo-TAQ across other healthcare systems and its potential impact on clinical outcomes and professional development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.