ArticleBMC medical education2025
Empowering medical residency training: a comparative analysis for understanding outpatient clinic demand and training needs.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Training, Experiences and Factors Contributing to Learning Variability in Podiatry Residency and Fellowship Programs: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Evaluating the Teaching Effectiveness of Interactive Virtual Platform Based on Artificial Intelligence for Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Training.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
- Impact of a structured remediation program on academic performance of family medicine residents in difficulty: A training centre experience.SAGE open medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis research aims to identify the most common diagnoses recorded in the outpatient clinic database of a Training Hospital where residents provide patient care under trainer supervision, evaluate the adequacy of current training programs in addressing these diagnoses, and provide data for trainers to enhance early-stage resident education to provide insight for curriculum development and increasing the effectiveness of residency training programmes.
methodsThe study involved ranking ICD-10 diagnosis codes by frequency for each department and surveying clinical medicine residents in their second year and above to gather their perspectives on speciality training.
resultsTwenty-four clinical medicine departments (13 internal, 11 surgical medicine) were included. The top 5 diagnoses for each speciality and their rates in all patient encounters were determined. While the first 5 diagnoses in some of the specialities covered almost 90% (or above) of the outpatient diagnoses (Ophthalmology, Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Gynaecology & Obstetrics), the place of the first five diagnoses in all diagnoses was determined as a very small proportion in departments such as Family Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Orthopaedics and Traumatology. The survey, which included 193 residents, uncovered that about half of the residents in both fields found the educational content partially sufficient (51.8%) and indicated a need for improvement in terms of expertise (70% in internal, vs. 51.8% in surgical medicine).
conclusionsThe research emphasises the importance of early training focused on the most prevalent diagnoses in each speciality to enhance patient management and advocates for a more active role for trainers in developing a tailored education program considering the prevalence of top diagnoses in different specialities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.