Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40148916›Full record

ReviewGenomics & informatics2025

Single-cell network biology enabling cell-type-resolved disease genetics.

Junha Cha, Insuk Lee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genomics & informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Junha ChaDepartment of Biotechnology, College of Life Science and Biotechnology, Yonsei University, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea. junhacha@yonsei.ac.kr.
Insuk LeeDepartment of Biotechnology, College of Life Science and Biotechnology, Yonsei University, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea. insuklee@yonsei.ac.kr.

Funding

Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea 2022M3A9F3016364
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene network models provide a foundation for graph theory approaches, aiding in the novel discovery of drug targets, disease genes, and genetic mechanisms for various biological functions. Disease genetics must be interpreted within the cellular context of disease-associated cell types, which cannot be achieved with datasets consisting solely of organism-level samples. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) technology allows computational distinction of cell states which provides a unique opportunity to understand cellular biology that drives disease processes. Importantly, the abundance of cell samples with their transcriptome-wide profile allows the modeling of systemic cell-type-specific gene networks (CGNs), offering insights into gene-cell-disease relationships. In this review, we present reference-based and de novo inference of gene functional interaction networks that we have recently developed using scRNA-seq datasets. We also introduce a compendium of CGNs as a useful resource for cell-type-resolved disease genetics. By leveraging these advances, we envision single-cell network biology as the key approach for mapping the gene-cell-disease axis.

Indexed as

Cell-type-resolved geneticsCell-type-specific networksSingle-cell network biology

Identifiers

PMID40148916
PMCPMC11951680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.