ArticleBMC health services research2025
A comparative study of neuro-fuzzy and neural network models in predicting length of stay in university hospital.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Effectiveness of Machine Learning Algorithms in Predicting Healthcare Service Quality Metrics: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Predictors of glucocorticoid treatment intensity after endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery in patients with non-functional pituitary adenomas: a retrospective study.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe time a patient spends in the hospital from admission to discharge is known as the length of stay (LOS). Predicting LOS is crucial for enhancing patient care, managing hospital resources, and optimizing the use of patient beds. Therefore, this study aimed to predict the LOS for patients hospitalized in various clinics using different artificial intelligence (AI) models.
methodsThe study analyzed 162,140 hospitalized patients aged 18 and older at various clinics of a university hospital in northern Türkiye from 2012 to 2020. Three soft computing methods-Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems (ANFIS), and Multiple Linear Regression Analysis (MLR)-were employed to estimate LOS using inputs such as medical and imaging services (number of CT, USG, ECG, hemogram tests, medical biochemistry, and number of direct x-rays), demographic, and diagnostic data (patients' age, sex, season of hospitalization, type of hospitalization, diagnosis, and second diagnosis). The LOS predictions utilized single and double-hidden layer ANNs with various training algorithms (Levenberg-Marquardt-LM, Bayesian Regularization-BR and Scaled Conjugate Gradient-SCG) and activation functions (tangent-sigmoid, purelin), ANFIS with Grid Partitioning (ANFIS-GP), and MLR. Model performance was evaluated using the Coefficient of Determination (R²), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE).
resultsOf the patients, 54% were male and 43.5% were treated in surgical clinics. The mean age was 55.1 years, with 32.9% of participants aged 65 years or older. Hospital stays were 2-7 days for 39.7% of patients, over 7 days for 30.9%, and 1 day for 29.4%. Neoplasm-related diagnoses (ICD codes) accounted for 25.1% of admissions. Variables influencing LOS were identified through feature selection from patients in various hospital wards. The most significant factors affecting LOS include second diagnosis, the number of hemogram tests, computerized tomography scans (CT), ultrasonography (USG), and direct X-rays. Utilizing these factors, 12 models with varied input variables were developed and analyzed. The double hidden layer ANN model with the Levenberg-Marquardt (LM) training algorithm outperformed the others, achieving R² values of 0.854 for training and 0.807 for the test dataset, with RMSE values of 2.397 days and 2.774 days and MAE values of 1.787 days and 1.994 days, respectively. Following ANN-LM, the best results were obtained with ANFIS-GP, while MLR exhibited the lowest performance.
conclusionsVarious AI models can effectively predict LOS for patients in different hospital units. Accurate LOS predictions can help health managers allocate resources more equitably across units.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.