ArticleBMC medical education2025
Investigating computed tomography radiographers' expertise in responding to severe contrast media reactions: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis the effectiveness nursing interventions for contrast-induced adverse reactions in postoperative general surgery patients undergoing contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2026Article
- Preparedness of CT technicians and radiographers for severe contrast media reactions: knowledge gaps and training needs.Frontiers in radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe use of intravenous contrast media (IVCM) in computed tomography (CT) scans enhances image quality by improving detail and accuracy, which is crucial for diagnosing complex medical conditions. While IVCM does provide notable benefits, it also carries the risk of rare but potentially life-threatening adverse reactions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the expertise and preparedness of CT radiographers in managing severe adverse reactions to IVCM. Furthermore, the research seeks to examine how variables such as professional experience, training, and practice location affect the competence of CT radiographers in managing such occurrences.
methodsThis cross-sectional survey assessed the knowledge and preparedness of Saudi CT radiographers in managing severe IVCM reactions. Following ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at King Abdullah Medical City (KAMC), an electronic survey was piloted with 15 radiographers for validation before distribution. Participants, recruited via snowball sampling through social media and professional networks, were accredited CT radiographers actively practicing in Saudi Arabia. The study examined knowledge variations based on experience, training, and practice setting. Although the target was 300 participants, 241 responses were obtained, providing meaningful insights into radiographers' competencies in contrast reaction management.
resultsWe assessed CT radiographers' knowledge and preparedness in managing severe IVCM reactions using different scales, achieving a high response rate of 97.2%. The overall knowledge measure demonstrated strong reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.854. The average knowledge score was 25.02 out of 40. Participants exhibited sufficient knowledge in various areas, with the highest proportion (93.4%) demonstrating awareness of precautionary measures for IVCM use. However, only 22.0% of participants attained consistent knowledge across all five assessed knowledge categories.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates the importance of continuous professional development and structured training, specifically following international criteria, in improving the understanding of CT radiographers in Saudi Arabia about the management of adverse reactions to contrast media. Senior experts, as well as those with international training, demonstrate exceptional expertise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.