ArticleBMC women's health2025
Risk factors of human papillomavirus-related cervical lesions in postmenopausal women: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe incidence of cervical cancer is increasing in postmenopausal women globally, particularly in less-developed nations, including China. However, research on cervical cancer screening methods and related factors in China is limited. In the present study, we aimed to identify the independent risk factors associated with cervical lesions in postmenopausal women. Additionally, we compared the clinical characteristics and demographic information between women diagnosed with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) and those with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions+ (HSIL+).
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study using qualitative human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing for cervical cancer screening among postmenopausal women across 23 districts and counties in Chengdu, China. Multivariate logistic analysis was employed to analyze demographic information, clinical history, and auxiliary examinations to identify independent risk factors for cervical lesions in postmenopausal women.
resultsA total of 917 patients participated in the study and were categorized as: 624 patients with LSIL (68.0%) and 293 patients with HSIL+ (32.0%). Multivariate analysis revealed that factors showing significant differences between two categories included co-infection with types 16 and 18 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.348, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.138-0.881, p = 0.026), mixed infections involving other types, HPV 16/18 (aOR = 0.514, 95% CI = 0.336-0.785, p = 0.002), transformation zone (TZ) 3 (aOR = 1.604, 95% CI = 1.018-2.528, p = 0.041), and colposcopy impressions indicating high-grade features and worse (aOR = 11.846, 95% CI = 2.132-65.807, p = 0.005).
conclusionsCo-infection with HPV types 16 and 18, as well as mixed infections involving HPV 16/18 and other types, TZ 3, and colposcopic features indicative of high-grade lesions and cancer, were identified as independent risk factors for HPV-related cervical lesions in postmenopausal women. Therefore, postmenopausal women with these high-risk factors need to undergo frequent cervical screening, and histopathological examination, if necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.