Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40148829›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Motivational factors influencing the choice of oncology as a specialty among French medical students.

Nicolas Penel, Pierre-Yves Cren, Christophe Ducroq, Estelle M N Laurent, Gabriel Choukroun, Marc Hazzan, Dominique Crie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Research Survey on Recognition of Medical Oncology among Medical Students and Junior Residents in Japan.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nicolas PenelCentre Oscar Lambret, Department of Medical Oncology, Lille University, 3 rue Combemale, Lille, 59020, France. n-penel@o-lambret.fr.
Pierre-Yves CrenCentre Oscar Lambret, Department of Medical Oncology, Lille University, 3 rue Combemale, Lille, 59020, France.
Christophe DucroqDepartment of Teaching Sciences, ULR-4354 - CIREL: Centre Interuniversitaire de Recherche en Education de Lille Laboratoire des sciences de l'éducation, University of Lille, Lille, France.
Estelle M N LaurentDepartment of Management, ULR-4999 - LUMEN: Lille university Management, Lille, France.
Gabriel ChoukrounDepartment of Nephrology, Internal Medicine, Dialysis and Transplantation, CHU Amiens, Jules Verne University of Picardie, Amiens, France.
Marc HazzanDepartment of Nephrology, Kidney Transplantation and Dialysis, CHU Lille, University of Lille, Lille, France.
Dominique CrieDepartment of Management, ULR-4999 - LUMEN: Lille university Management, Lille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is limited data regarding what motivations are behind the choice of oncology (both medical oncology and radiation oncology) as a specialty among medical students. Therefore, the aim of this study is to identify the factors that motivate medical students to choose oncology as a specialty.

methodsMedical students of classes 2022 and 2023 in the Universities of Lille and Amiens (North of France) were enrolled in a quantitative online survey. Chi-square automatic interaction detection (CHAID) and binary and multiple linear regressions were performed to identify the factors that determine the choice of specialty among the students.

resultsAmong 563 respondents (response rate: 45%) who participated in the survey, 14, 13, and 14 were considering oncology as their first (2.5%), second (2.3%), and third (2.5%) specialty choices, respectively. The CHAID analysis retained two factors: "rotation in the medical oncology unit" (p < .0001) and "identification with a physician practicing the desired specialty" (p = 0.049). The factors identified in the multivariate regression analysis (weighted according to first, second, or third choices) differed according to sex. In men, rotation in a radiation oncology unit (β = 0.190; p < 0.001) or a medical oncology unit (β = 0.227; p = 0.010) and interest in fundamental research (β = 0.063; p < 0.001) were positively associated with choosing oncology as a specialty, whereas working in rural areas (β=-0.094; p = 0.014) was negatively associated with choosing oncology as a specialty. In women, rotation in a medical oncology unit (β = 0.289; p < 0.001), interest in cultivating a long-term relationship with patients (β = 0.129; p < 0.001), and interest in a hospital-based career (β = 0.214;p < 0.001) were positively associated with choosing oncology as a specialty; whereas desire to see the results of treatments quickly (β=-0.143; p = 0.018) and working in rural areas (β=-0.153; p  = 0.006) were negatively associated with choosing oncology as a specialty.

conclusionsExperience during hospital rotations plays a crucial role in the specialty choices made by medical students. The motivations behind choosing oncology as a specialty differ according to gender. Intrinsic motivations (interests in fundamental research or in cultivating a long-term relationship with patients) and contextual factors (rural life or interest in a hospital-based career) influence the specialty choices of medical students.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceMedical OncologyMotivationStudents, MedicalAdultFemaleFranceHumansMaleRadiation OncologySurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultHospital rotationMedical studentsMotivationOncologySpecialty choice

Identifiers

PMID40148829
PMCPMC11948871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.