ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025
A mobile app to improve adherence to colorectal cancer screening and post polypectomy surveillance guidelines.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Validation of a Digital Platform for Colorectal Cancer Risk Stratification and Personalized Screening Recommendations.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite significant advances in prevention and early detection, colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Inadequate adherence and/or lack of knowledge of guidelines have shown to prevent adequate screening and surveillance recommendations and hinder effective screening programs.
objectiveEvaluate the implementation and real-world impact of a mobile app designed to optimize CRC screening and surveillance in accordance to recently updated guidelines.
methodsA mobile app including ergonomic algorithms integrating all pertinent guideline information was created by a group of experts. Data were collected from Catalonia healthcare professionals using the app between February 2023 and May 2024. Users' characteristics, consultation types, and patient data were analyzed to assess app's implementation, usage patterns, and impact on CRC screening and surveillance outcomes.
resultsA total of 12,481 consultations were recorded; 3,054 (24.4%) screening and 9,427 (75.6%) post-polypectomy surveillance consultations. The app was increasingly and repeatedly used by professionals during the study period (72% retention rate). Among screening consultations, 2,082 (68.2%) patients were classified as average risk, suggesting the use of fecal occult blood test (FOBT) instead of colonoscopy. Among surveillance consultations, the app advised deferring follow-up colonoscopies and using FOBT instead in 4,748 (50%) patients based on negative index colonoscopy or the presence of low-risk polyps. Standard surveillance with colonoscopy at 3 years was recommended for 3,224 (34.1%) patients and intensive surveillance, requiring a colonoscopy at 1 year, was indicated for 749 (7.9%) patients.
conclusionsA CRC screening and surveillance mobile app showed remarkable acceptance and uptake among healthcare professionals. Proper implementation of updated guidelines aided by the use of the app could significantly reduce the number of unnecessary screening and post-polypectomy surveillance colonoscopies, as well as help identifying high risk patients who require intensive surveillance. CLINICAL TRIAL: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.