ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025
SCITUNA: single-cell data integration tool using network alignment.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Defining the role of natural killer cells in acute myeloid leukemia through the lens of single-cell omics.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs single-cell genomics experiments increase in complexity and scale, the need to integrate multiple datasets has grown. Such integration enhances cellular feature identification by leveraging larger data volumes. However, batch effects-technical variations arising from differences in labs, times, or protocols-pose a significant challenge. Despite numerous proposed batch correction methods, many still have limitations, such as outputting only dimension-reduced data, relying on computationally intensive models, or resulting in overcorrection for batches with diverse cell type composition.
resultsWe introduce a novel method for batch effect correction named SCITUNA, a Single-Cell data Integration Tool Using Network Alignment. We perform evaluations on 39 individual batches from four real datasets and a simulated dataset, which include both scRNA-seq and scATAC-seq datasets, spanning multiple organisms and tissues. A thorough comparison of existing batch correction methods using 13 metrics reveals that SCITUNA outperforms current approaches and is successful at preserving biological signals present in the original data. In particular, SCITUNA shows a better performance than the current methods in all the comparisons except for the multiple batch integration of the lung dataset where the difference is 0.004.
conclusionSCITUNA effectively removes batch effects while retaining the biological signals present in the data. Our extensive experiments reveal that SCITUNA will be a valuable tool for diverse integration tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.