Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40148808›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025

SCITUNA: single-cell data integration tool using network alignment.

Aissa Houdjedj, Yacine Marouf, Mekan Myradov, Süleyman Onur Doğan, Burak Onur Erten, Oznur Tastan, Cesim Erten, Hilal Kazan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aissa HoudjedjAntalya Bilim University, 07190, Antalya, Turkey.
Yacine MaroufWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA.
Mekan MyradovSabanci University, 34956, Istanbul, Turkey.
Süleyman Onur DoğanAntalya Bilim University, 07190, Antalya, Turkey.
Burak Onur ErtenAntalya Bilim University, 07190, Antalya, Turkey.
Oznur TastanSabanci University, 34956, Istanbul, Turkey.
Cesim ErtenUniversity of Arizona, Tucson, 85721, USA. cesim@cs.arizona.edu.
Hilal KazanAntalya Bilim University, 07190, Antalya, Turkey. hilal.kazan@antalya.edu.tr.

Funding

Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu 121E491
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs single-cell genomics experiments increase in complexity and scale, the need to integrate multiple datasets has grown. Such integration enhances cellular feature identification by leveraging larger data volumes. However, batch effects-technical variations arising from differences in labs, times, or protocols-pose a significant challenge. Despite numerous proposed batch correction methods, many still have limitations, such as outputting only dimension-reduced data, relying on computationally intensive models, or resulting in overcorrection for batches with diverse cell type composition.

resultsWe introduce a novel method for batch effect correction named SCITUNA, a Single-Cell data Integration Tool Using Network Alignment. We perform evaluations on 39 individual batches from four real datasets and a simulated dataset, which include both scRNA-seq and scATAC-seq datasets, spanning multiple organisms and tissues. A thorough comparison of existing batch correction methods using 13 metrics reveals that SCITUNA outperforms current approaches and is successful at preserving biological signals present in the original data. In particular, SCITUNA shows a better performance than the current methods in all the comparisons except for the multiple batch integration of the lung dataset where the difference is 0.004.

conclusionSCITUNA effectively removes batch effects while retaining the biological signals present in the data. Our extensive experiments reveal that SCITUNA will be a valuable tool for diverse integration tasks.

Indexed as

Computational BiologySingle-Cell AnalysisSoftwareAlgorithmsAnimalsGenomicsHumansBatch effectIterative correctionRare cell typesSingle-cell data integration

Identifiers

PMID40148808
PMCPMC11951583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.