Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40148792›Full record

Trial reportBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

A randomised feasibility tolerability study of aminophylline for the prevention of preterm labour.

Natasha Singh, Nishel Mohan Shah, Gavin Sooranna, Miriam Bourke, Angela Yulia, Cheryl Battersby, Rachel M Tribe, Mark R Johnson

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03152942 (A Randomised Controlled Feasibility Study of the Tolerability of the Combination of Progesterone and Aminophylline for the Prevention of Preterm Labour), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03152942 phase1unknown statusnot on this map

A Randomised Controlled Feasibility Study of the Tolerability of the Combination of Progesterone and Aminophylline for the Prevention of Preterm Labour

TypeinterventionalSponsorSt Stephens Aids TrustRan2017 to 2019Enrolled70ConditionsPremature Obstetric LaborArmsProgesterone, Aminophylline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Natasha SinghDirectorate of Women and Children, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital London, Imperial College London, London, UK. n.mohammed@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5130-9679
Nishel Mohan ShahDirectorate of Women and Children, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital London, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Gavin SoorannaDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College, London, UK.
Miriam BourkeResearch and Development, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK.
Angela YuliaDirectorate of Women and Children, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital London, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Cheryl BattersbySection of Neonatal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Rachel M TribeLife Sciences and Medicine, St Thomas' Hospital Campus, King's College London, London, UK.
Mark R JohnsonDirectorate of Women and Children, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital London, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProgesterone is known to maintain uterine quiescence as pregnancy advances. Recently, its efficacy in preventing preterm birth has been questioned prompting a search for an alternative treatment option. Cyclic AMP has been shown invitro to act in synergy with progesterone to maintain uterine quiescence.

methodsWe undertook an open label randomised feasibility study to test the hypothesis that the addition of aminophylline to the standard of care (SoC) is acceptable and can be tolerated in pregnant women at high risk of spontaneous preterm labour (sPTL). Women at high risk of sPTL, who met the inclusion criteria were invited to participate and randomised to receive the SoC (progesterone alone, n = 33) or treatment with the SoC and aminophylline (n = 37). The main outcome measure was to assess the how many women at high-risk of sPTL tolerated and continued to take aminophylline. Data were analysed using Graphpad Prism 8.0c (Graphpad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

resultsWe found that of the addition of aminophylline was well tolerated in 30 of the 33 (91%) of women who continued in the combined arm, without any additional adverse maternal or fetal outcomes. 58% of eligible women agreed to participate in the study. The compliance rate was high at 99.42% +-0.82%. 67% of the women completed the post study questionnaire and all stated their willingness to take aminophylline if it were offered routinely for the prevention of sPTL.

conclusionsThe addition of aminophylline to the SoC is acceptable to women at high-risk of sPTL confirming that a randomised trial of aminophylline to reduce preterm delivery in women at high-risk of PTL is feasible.

trial registrationClinical trial gov NCT03152942. Date of full registration: 15/5/2017. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03152942?cond=NCT03152942%26;draw=2%26;rank=1 .

Indexed as

AminophyllineObstetric Labor, PrematureAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansPregnancyProgesteroneAminophyllineProgesteroneAminophyllinePreterm birthPreterm preventionProgesterone

Identifiers

PMID40148792
PMCPMC11948830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.