Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40148784›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2025

Co-producing an intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour in community-dwelling older adults aged ≥ 75 informed by behaviour change theory.

Ragy Tadrous, Anne Forster, Amanda Farrin, Peter A Coventry, Andrew Clegg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Interventions to reduce sedentary behaviour in community-dwelling older adults: a mixed-method review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ragy TadrousUniversity of Leeds, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Temple Bank House, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Duckworth Lane, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK. rtadrous@tcd.ie.
Anne ForsterUniversity of Leeds, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Temple Bank House, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Duckworth Lane, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK.
Amanda FarrinUniversity of Leeds, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Temple Bank House, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Duckworth Lane, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK.
Peter A CoventryDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Andrew CleggUniversity of Leeds, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Temple Bank House, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Duckworth Lane, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder adults are the fastest-growing and most sedentary group in society. With sedentary behaviour associated with negative health outcomes, reducing sedentary time may improve overall well-being. Adults aged ≥ 75 years are underrepresented in sedentary behaviour research, and tailored strategies to reduce sedentary time may be warranted. The development of an intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour in adults aged ≥ 75 years using co-production and behaviour change theory is reported.

methodsFour co-production workshops with community-dwelling older adults aged ≥ 75 years were held between October-December 2022. The intervention development process was informed by the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) and Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Audio recordings and workshop notes were iteratively analysed, with findings used to inform subsequent workshops.

resultsThe co-production group consisted of six community-dwelling older adults aged ≥ 75 years and two researchers. The developed intervention consists of four components (activity monitoring, educational material, group sessions and researcher follow-up), maps to 24 behaviour change techniques and targets barriers to reducing sedentary time. Participants were receptive of the co-production process.

conclusionsIntegrating co-production with the BCW can provide several benefits, with the BCW providing structure to the intervention development process, and co-production increasing the likelihood of the developed intervention being viewed as feasible by older adults. Furthermore, coding intervention components to the BCW may further our understanding of what approaches are successful at influencing behavioural change. Transparent reporting of the intervention development process may benefit researchers developing interventions with older adults. Future research will pilot the co-produced intervention.

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyIndependent LivingSedentary BehaviorAgedAged, 80 and overExerciseFemaleHumansMaleBehaviour changeCo-productionFrailtyOlder adultsSedentary behaviour

Identifiers

PMID40148784
PMCPMC11951794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.