ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2025
Improved breast cancer diagnosis using a CA15-3 capture antibody-lectin sandwich assay.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to test the hypothesis that an enzyme-linked antibody-lectin sandwich assay for a glycovariant of CA15-3 can deliver better diagnostic performance, defined by classification accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, for breast cancer compared to an existing FDA-approved CA15-3 test.
methodsA genetically engineered lectin (SubB2M) that specifically binds N-glycolylneuraminic acid (Neu5Gc) was used as a detection reagent in a CA15-3 capture antibody-lectin sandwich (neuCA15-3) assay. In a case: control cohort equivalence study the classification accuracy for the neuCA15-3 assay was determined and compared to an FDA-approved CA15-3 IVD test (Elecsys CA15-3 II, Roche Diagnostics).
resultsClassification accuracy and AUC for neuCA15-3 were 81% and 0.886 ± 0.015 (standard error, n = 567) and for Elecsys CA15-3 II, 55% and 0.642 ± 0.023 (n = 558), respectively. At a threshold cut-off serum concentration of 23.6 units/ml, overall breast cancer classification accuracy of the neuCA15-3 was 81% (compared to 55% for the comparator assay, p < 0.001). At 95% specificity, the sensitivity of the neuCA15-3 assay was 69.5%, significantly greater than the comparator assay (11.9%, p < 0.001). neuCA15-3 concentrations did not vary significantly with breast cancer receptor subtype or comorbidities tested.
conclusionsThe diagnostic performance of neuCA15-3 was substantially improved by specifically targeting both a CA15-3 protein epitope and a pan-cancer glycan (Neu5Gc) epitope (the specific binding target of SubB2M). The reporter signal generated depends on the colocalization of the cancer antigen protein epitope and the aberrant sialylation of the protein, thus increasing the assay specificity. The presence of multiple Neu5Gc lectin-binding sites per glycoprotein molecule increases signal generation and assay sensitivity. The inclusion of additional cancer biomarkers in a multivariate index assay format may further increase diagnostic performance for breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.