Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40148638›Full record

ArticleBritish dental journal2025

Exploring dental professionals' perceptions of resilience to dental environment stress: a qualitative study.

Marina Harris, Kenneth Eaton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marina HarrisAssociate Professor of Dental Education and Wellbeing, School of Dental, Health and Care Professions, Faculty of Science, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, United Kingdom. marina.harris@port.ac.uk.
Kenneth EatonVisiting Professor, School of Dental, Health and Care Professions, Faculty of Science, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims This study aimed to investigate what constitutes the meaning of resilience to dental environment stress for different members of the dental team, and how resilience is operationalised by these team members. It also aimed to clarify if there were different or similar sources of stress for different groups.Methods Participants were recruited from dentists, dental therapists, dental hygienists, dental nurses, dental technicians and clinical dental technicians. In total, 22 participants provided informed consent to take part and were interviewed - 17 online and five in person. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. The transcripts were member checked and then analysed. Codes were generated and grouped into themes. The University of Portsmouth Science and Health Faculty Ethics Committee approved the study.Results Three themes with 11 sub-themes were identified. The sub-themes were: expectations associated with working environment; pressures associated with working environment; team dynamics; taking a balanced view; engaging with support networks; achieving work/life balance; diversity and variety in role; organisation; sense of purpose; gratitude; and positive relationships. Many of the stresses which were identified were common to all team members.Conclusions The findings highlighted disparities and similarities with experiences which need to be addressed to further enhance dental professionals' wellbeing. They will also inform a planned national quantitative study.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDentistsOccupational StressResilience, PsychologicalStress, PsychologicalAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID40148638
PMCPMC11949828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.