ArticleCVIR endovascular2025
Controversies in treating nutcracker syndrome.
Article in CVIR endovascular, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Laparoscopic and robotic extravascular stenting of the left renal vein for anterior nutcracker syndrome in a single-center series.Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders · 2026Article
- Nutcracker syndrome in 2026: a nephrologist-oriented diagnosis and management.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Review
- Microscopic ligation combined with shunt procedure versus microsurgical varicocelectomy for nutcracker syndrome and left varicocele: a randomized controlled trial.Basic and clinical andrology · 2026Article
- Beyond bladder clots: Unmasking nutcracker syndrome in refractory hematuria: A case report.Radiology case reports · 2025Article
- Breaking the Nutcracker: a case-based review of diagnosis and surgical treatment.Journal of surgical case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nutcracker syndrome (NCS) is a relatively uncommon vascular condition characterized by compression of the left renal vein (LRV), resulting in a variable spectrum of nonspecific symptoms, including hematuria, flank pain, varicocele, and pelvic congestion syndrome. NCS can be classified into anterior and posterior types regarding the origin of LRV compression: anterior NCS occurs when LRV is compressed between the aorta and superior mesenteric artery, whereas posterior NCS involves LRV compression between the aorta and the spine. Despite advancements in diagnostic modalities, including Doppler ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and invasive techniques like phlebography, there is still no globally accepted diagnostic algorithm, leading to inconsistencies in diagnosis. Moreover, due to the lack of standardized treatment guidelines, the optimal management of anterior NCS remains a topic of debate. While conservative management is usually recommended in the pediatric population, invasive treatments-including surgical options like LRV transposition and renal autotransplantation, as well as interventional radiology procedures like stenting, present challenges such as stent migration, restenosis, and long-term material durability. Nevertheless, the emergence of 3D-printed stents offers potential improvements in patient-specific treatment, particularly in the pediatric population, yet their clinical efficacy and safety remain under investigation. This brief communication addresses the current discussions regarding anterior NCS management, emphasizing the need for standardized diagnostic algorithms, a multidisciplinary approach, and continued technological advancements to refine treatment possibilities and strategies. Further research is critical to resolve these controversies and establish a consensus on best practices.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.