ArticleNature microbiology2025
Processing-bias correction with DEBIAS-M improves cross-study generalization of microbiome-based prediction models.
Article in Nature microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- The cervicovaginal gut microbiota axis as a key determinant of systemic physiology.Gut microbes · 2026Review
- GutMIND: A multi-cohort machine learning framework for integrative characteristics of the microbiota-gut-brain axis in neuropsychiatric disorders.Gut microbes · 2026Article
- Decoding the cancer microbiome: multi-omics, AI, and translational opportunities.Genome biology · 2026Review
- Multidisciplinary Delphi consensus statement on minimal standards for clinical metadata and end points in microbiome studies.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026Review
- Microbiome and aging: Trajectories of microbiome age across human ecosystems and their systemic effects.iMeta · 2026Review
- mBatchNet: an interactive web server for diagnosis, correction, and benchmarking of batch effects in microbiome data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Review
- Identifying unmeasured heterogeneity in microbiome data via quantile thresholding (QuanT).Microbiome · 2026Article
- Decoding the reproductive microbiome: enabling clinical and biological insights through machine and deep learning.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Distributional bias compromises leave-one-out cross-validation.Science advances · 2025Article
- Systematic evaluation of metatranscriptomic differential gene expressionbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Identification of Sample Processing Errors in Microbiome Studies Using Host Genetic Profiles.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Microbiome data integration via shared dictionary learning.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Compositional transformations can reasonably introduce phenotype-associated values into sparse features.mSystems · 2025Article
- Compositional transformations can reasonably introduce phenotype-associated values into sparse features.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Domain adaptation in small-scale and heterogeneous biological datasets.Science advances · 2024Review
- Early prediction of preeclampsia using the first trimester vaginal microbiome.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Every step in common microbiome profiling protocols has variable efficiency for each microbe, for example, different DNA extraction efficiency for Gram-positive bacteria. These processing biases impede the identification of signals that are biologically interpretable and generalizable across studies. 'Batch-correction' methods have been used to address these issues computationally with some success, but they are largely non-interpretable and often require the use of an outcome variable in a manner that risks overfitting. We present DEBIAS-M (domain adaptation with phenotype estimation and batch integration across studies of the microbiome), an interpretable framework for inference and correction of processing bias, which facilitates domain adaptation in microbiome studies. DEBIAS-M learns bias-correction factors for each microbe in each batch that simultaneously minimize batch effects and maximize cross-study associations with phenotypes. Using diverse benchmarks including 16S rRNA and metagenomic sequencing, classification and regression, and a variety of clinical and molecular targets, we demonstrate that using DEBIAS-M improves cross-study prediction accuracy compared with commonly used batch-correction methods. Notably, we show that the inferred bias-correction factors are stable, interpretable and strongly associated with specific experimental protocols. Overall, we show that DEBIAS-M facilitates improved modelling of microbiome data and identification of interpretable signals that generalize across studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.