SynthesisWorld journal of urology2025
The effectiveness of remote interventions based on digital health technology in kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review.
Synthesis in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Evaluation of the effectiveness of digital health interventions in the postoperative management of lung transplant recipients.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Influencing Factors of Mobile Health Apps in Kidney Transplant Care: Systematic Review Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- The mediating role of self-efficacy in the association between social support and eHealth literacy among kidney transplant recipients.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Telemonitoring post-renal transplantation and role of advanced practice nurses: a single center experience.Frontiers in nephrology · 2026Article
- Digital technology empowers model innovation in chronic disease management in Chinese grassroots communities.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the application effect of remote interventions based on digital health technology in kidney transplant patients through a systematic review.
designSystematic review.
methodsThe databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Web of Science were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials and quasi - experimental studies on remote interventions based on digital health technology in kidney transplant recipients. The search time limit ranged from the establishment of the databases to September 2024.
resultsA total of 10 articles were included, involving 535 patients. A total of 21 clinical outcomes were identified in this study and they were classified into three categories, namely: ① Health-related conditions: Number of steps (n = 1), heart rate (n = 1), self-burden score (n = 1), self-management ability (n = 1), quality of life score (n = 2), Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) (n = 1), psychological distress (n = 1). ② Medication adherence and average tacrolimus concentration: Medication adherence (n = 5), number of missed doses (n = 1), medication errors (n = 1), rejection reactions (n = 1), average creatinine level (n = 1), tacrolimus blood concentration level (n = 2), within-patient variability of tacrolimus (n = 1), coefficient of variation (CV) of tacrolimus (n = 1). ③ Medical economic status: Nursing satisfaction (n = 1), incidence of adverse events (n = 1), rate of unplanned hospitalization (n = 3), duration of unplanned hospitalization (n = 1), one-year medical cost (n = 2), nursing cost (n = 1).
conclusionRemote interventions based on digital health technology can improve the health - related conditions, medication adherence and medical economic status of kidney transplant recipients. However, its impact on tacrolimus concentration remains unclear. Clinical medical staff should fully recognize its positive effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.