Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40148514›Full record

ReviewBJC reports2025

Tumour measurements on imaging for clinical trial: A national picture of service provision.

Georgina Hopkinson, Jonathan Taylor, Jonathan Wadsley, Angela Darekar, Christina Messiou, Dow-Mu Koh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJC reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Georgina HopkinsonDepartment of Radiology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. Georgina.Hopkinson@rmh.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4967-8886
Jonathan TaylorSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Jonathan WadsleyWeston Park Cancer Centre, Sheffield, UK.
Angela DarekarUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Christina MessiouDepartment of Radiology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Dow-Mu KohDepartment of Radiology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadiological response evaluation metrics such as RECIST 1.1 inform critical endpoints in oncology trials. The UK was the 6th highest recruiter into oncology trials worldwide between 1999 and 2022, with almost 9000 oncology trials registered during the same period. However, the provision of tumour measurements for oncology trials is often ad hoc and patchy across the NHS. The aim of this work was to understand the barriers to providing an effective imaging tumour measurement service, gain insight into service delivery models and consider the successes and challenges from the perspective of both service providers and end users.

methodsAn electronic survey was distributed to those who provide tumour measurement response review for clinical trials (service providers) and those that request and use such measurements in trial activities (service users).

resultsResponses from 35 sites demonstrated substantial variation in service provision across the UK. Despite workforce pressures, service is largely delivered through radiologists with a minority utilising radiographer role extension. Only 20% of the service providers had dedicated training and 29% received robust financial reimbursement. DISCUSSION: Service variation is likely a consequence of limited training, education and infrastructure to support robust service, compounded by increasing radiology workload and workforce pressures.

Identifiers

PMID40148514
PMCPMC11950641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.