ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
Leveraging electronic medical records to evaluate a computerized decision support system for staphylococcus bacteremia.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
51 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Infectious disease specialists (IDS) improve outcomes of patients with Staphylococcus bacteremia, but immediate IDS access is not always guaranteed. We investigated whether a care-integrated computerized decision support system (CDSS) can safely enhance the standard of care (SOC) for these patients. We conducted a multicenter, noninferiority, interventional stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial relying on the data integration centers at five university hospitals. By this means, electronic medical records can be used for part of the trial documentation. We analyzed 5056 patients from 134 wards (Staphylococcus aureus (SAB): n = 812, coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS): n = 4244) and found that the CDSS was noninferior to the SOC for hospital mortality in all patients. Noninferiority regarding the 90-day mortality/relapse in SAB patients was not observed and there was no evidence for differences in vancomycin usage among CoNS patients. Despite low reported usage, physicians rated the CDSS's usability favorably. Trial registration: drks.de; Identifier: DRKS00014320; Registration Date: 2019-05-06.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.