ArticleScientific reports2025
Randomized-field microwave-assisted pharmaceutical lyophilization with closed-loop control.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanistic models with experimental comparison for microwave-assisted lyophilization in a vial.AAPS open · 2026Article
- Emerging Manufacturing Technologies in Freeze-Drying of Pharmaceuticals.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Recent trends in pharmaceutical freeze-drying and control strategies observed in human drug applications and manufacturing inspections.AAPS open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The current lyophilization technology for biopharmaceuticals and vaccine products is capital and energy-intensive, largely due to the use of indirect, conductive heat transfer. The heat removal and input in freezing, primary drying, and secondary drying are via contact between the product and shelves cooled or heated by a circulating working fluid such as silicone oil. This is slow, inefficient, and leads to non-uniform freezing and drying, especially in large-scale production systems. To address the current throughput limitations of conventional lyophilization, this collaborative project by Purdue University, Merck and IMA Life develops the next generation of tunable randomized-field microwave lyophilization system demonstrating significant acceleration over conventional freeze-drying processes. The system uses a microwave source delivering electromagnetic energy to the lyophilization chamber at frequencies between 8 GHz and 18 GHz at power levels below 400 W and mechanical stirrers for field randomization to achieve uniform heating. The frequency range is selected due to its greater efficiency for heating ice relative to traditional industrial microwave frequencies of 915 MHz and 2.45 GHz. During operation, temperature is measured directly using optical sensors, providing robust real-time product data. Closed-loop control algorithms enable direct control of the product temperature throughout the drying process, ensuring the material is dried at an optimal rate. The results of quasi-Random Field (qRF) microwave drying for several benchmark formulations, including an attenuated live virus vaccine, are presented and compared with the corresponding conventional lyophilization processes. A model for the product temperature and primary drying time is developed and validated against experimental cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.