ArticleScientific reports2025
Overwinter and prespawning movements by a vulnerable freshwater pelagophilic minnow.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluating Fishing Ban Effectiveness Through Spatiotemporal Changes in Genetic Diversity ofEcology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The decline of pelagophil minnows is related to river fragmentation across the southern Great Plains landscape. Because we know little about pelagophil movement patterns and timing, we aimed to quantify the movements of the vulnerable Arkansas River shiner (ARS) during the winter (November-March) and prespawning (April-June) seasons. We tagged 4233 ARS using visible implant elastomer, passive integrated transponder, or p-Chip micro-transponder tags in 2018-2020. We sampled to recapture tagged fish weekly during the winter and biweekly during the spring. Tagged fish exhibited a downstream movement bias and movement was weakly related to increasing temperature, discharge, and photoperiod during winter, however most of the variability was explained by a random individual effect. Larger individuals moved greater distances than smaller fish. Upstream movements by a migratory portion of the population appeared to begin around late February based on the presence of fish at previously unoccupied sites. However, the first long-distance (30-km) upstream movement by a tagged fish was documented in late May. We show evidence that some ARS may be resident fish at sites throughout winter and spring of multiple years. To conserve freshwater pelagophil minnows, our results indicate water management strategies improving river connectivity in late winter through the spawning season may benefit spawning by migratory individuals, whereas lateral connectivity might benefit the resident portion of the population. Research efforts under experimental flows could provide insight to improved recovery options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.