ArticleScientific reports2025
An accurate approach to discriminate android colluded malware from single app malware using permissions intelligence.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design of an integrated evidence-driven few-shot meta-learning for zero-day malware detection and forensic attributions.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Ensemble machine learning for proactive android ransomware detection using network traffic.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mobile devices are vulnerable to malicious apps that jeopardize user privacy and device integrity. This includes single-app malware that operates independently and colluding Android apps that collaborate with each other to carry out a malicious attack. Existing detection methods primarily focus on single-app malware and hence will misclassify colluding Android apps. This paper introduces SigColDroid, a novel approach for detecting colluding Android apps and single-app malware by leveraging dangerous permissions. The research begins by extracting and identifying key features, such as permissions, smali file size, and permission rates, for model training. To facilitate comprehensive evaluation, a balanced dataset of 1455 apps is created, consisting of 485 benign apps, 485 randomly sampled single-app malware from the AndroZoo repository, and 485 colluding applications. Extensive experimentation is conducted using five ensemble classifiers: random forest, Extra Trees, AdaBoost, XGBoost, and LightGBM alongside our proposed custom Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Deep Neural Network (DNN) architectures. The classifiers are evaluated based on five metrics: Precision, Recall, F1-score, accuracy, and the area under the receiver operation curve (ROC_AUC). The experimental findings highlight the following key insights: (i) Identification of the five most significant permission features for detecting colluding applications; (ii) Positive impact of smali file size and permission rates on classification performance; (iii) Superior performance of Random Forest with a ROC_AUC of 99.48% and LightGBM with 96.91% accuracy, 96.96% precision, 96.90% recall and 96.90% F1-score compared to other classifiers; (iv) Comparative analysis with previous research demonstrates that SigColDroid, despite utilizing fewer features, outperforms state-of-the-art approaches. The proposed approach presents an effective solution for detecting colluding Android apps using permissions and contributes to the advancement of improved detection and prevention mechanisms in mobile security.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.