ArticleScientific reports2025
Tuberculosis in found dead badgers at the edge of the expanding bovine tuberculosis epidemic.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proteome microarray-guided identification of mycobacterial antigens and ELISA-based peptide mapping for improved serological detection ofJournal of clinical microbiology · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) is a major disease of cattle in the UK, placing a significant economic burden on the taxpayer. The causative agent, Mycobacterium bovis, has a wide host range, including the European badger (Meles meles). While badgers have been implicated in the transmission and maintenance of infection in cattle in areas of endemic disease, their role at the edge of the endemic area is poorly understood. Here we present data on the prevalence of infection in badgers collected along the southern edge of England's bTB epidemic. Stakeholders across five counties (Oxfordshire, Berkshire, Buckinghamshire, Hampshire, and East Sussex) submitted found-dead badgers for post-mortem examination and testing by bacterial culture. The overall prevalence, as confirmed by whole genome sequencing, was 6.5% (28/428), ranging between 1.1% (1/88) in Hampshire and 13.0% (14/108) in Oxfordshire. The commonest M. bovis clade in badgers was B6-62, which was predominant in 4/5 counties. B6-62 was also the commonest clade found in cattle and was detected in all counties except East Sussex where, although absent from the cattle population, it was detected in local badgers. This study highlights the co-incidence of infection in badgers and cattle in parts of the southern edge area consistent with localised clustering of infection in both species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.