ArticleScientific reports2025
Feasibility study of AI-assisted multi-parameter MRI diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic performance of AI-powered prostate MRI against biopsy ground truth: quasi-continuous risk scoring versus fixed PI-RADS thresholds.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026Article
- PRAD-Hybrid CNN (PRADHC): A Deep Learning Model for Assisted Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer on MRICurrent medical imaging · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a deep learning-based model for predicting prostate cancer in patients with gray-zone PSA levels: a comparative study with clinician observations.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Integrating clinical and technological perspectives to enhance predictive modeling in prostate cancer surgery.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence Across the Prostate Cancer Pathway: Screening, Imaging, Pathology, and Biomarkers.Cureus · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in prostate cancer: navigating the new frontier of precision uro-oncology.American journal of clinical and experimental urology · 2025Review
- Predicting uninformative prostate magnetic resonance imaging sequences: a hypothesis-generating pilot study.Radiologia brasileiraArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Distinguishing between benign and malignant prostate lesions in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) poses challenges that affect prostate cancer screening accuracy. We propose a novel computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system to extract cancerous lesions from the prostate in multi-parametric MRI (mp-MRI), assessing the feasibility of using artificial intelligence for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa). A retrospective study was conducted on 106 patients who underwent mp-MRI from 2021 to 2024 at a single center. We analyzed three sequences (T2W, DCE, and DWI) and collected 137 mp-MRI images corresponding to pathological sections. From these, we obtained 274 sets of ROI data, using 206 for training and validation, and 68 for testing. A feature extractor was developed using a pre-trained ResNet50 model combined with a multi-head attention mechanism to fuse modality-specific features and perform classification. The experimental results indicate that our model demonstrates high classification performance, achieving an AUC of 0.89. The PR curve shows high precision across most recall values, with an AUC of 0.91. We developed a novel CAD system based on deep learning ResNet50 models to assess the risk of prostate malignancy in mpMRI images. High classification ability is achieved, and combining the attention mechanism or optimization strategy can improve the performance of the model in medical imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.