Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40147993›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Physiotherapy and Optimised Enteral Nutrition In the post-acute phase of critical illness (PHOENIX): protocol for a mixed methods feasibility randomised controlled trial.

David McWilliams, Owen Gustafson, Nicola Wyer, Keith Couper, Peter Kimani, Rebecca Kandiyali, Dalia Barghouthy, Rebekah Haylett, Holly Richardson, Miles Negus-Fancey and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06159868 (Physiotherapy and Optimised Enteral Nutrition In the Post-acute Phase of Critical Illness), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06159868 nacompletednot on this map

Physiotherapy and Optimised Enteral Nutrition In the Post-acute Phase of Critical Illness (PHOENIX): A Randomised Controlled Feasibility Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS TrustRan2024 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsCritical IllnessArmsStructured physiotherapy and rehabilitation, Standard care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

David McWilliamsCentre for Care Excellence, Coventry University, Coventry, UK ac3572@coventry.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9086-2557
Owen GustafsonOxford Allied Health Professions Research & Innovation Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5450-3696
Nicola WyerUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
Keith CouperUniversity of Warwick, Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick, UK.
Peter KimaniWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Coventry, UK.
Rebecca KandiyaliCentre for Health Economics (CHEW), University of Warwick, Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Coventry, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8566-9536
Dalia BarghouthyCritical Care, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
Rebekah HaylettOxford Allied Health Professions Research & Innovation Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Holly RichardsonDietetics, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1866-481X
Miles Negus-FanceyPatient Representative, England, UK.
Elizabeth KingOxford Allied Health Professions Research & Innovation Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
L GalliePatient Representative, England, UK.
Zudin PuthuchearyCritical Care, The Royal London Hospital, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4267-1892

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEach year in the UK, 140 000 patients are discharged from intensive care units (ICUs) to general hospital wards, almost all with complex rehabilitation needs. 84% of patients still require nutritional support and 98% are not physically independent. Despite this, many are discharged from ICU without a nutrition plan, and failure to recognise malnutrition is common. Consequently, malnutrition persists in the ward environment, leading to poor outcomes and acting as a barrier to successful physical rehabilitation. This transition from intensive care to the ward represents a key stage in the recovery journey, and a window for optimising physical independence prior to hospital discharge, decreasing the need for support in the community. However, uncertainty as to how best to provide ongoing rehabilitation which combines adequate nutrition and exercise on the general ward has driven widespread variation in practice.We have previously shown the benefits of delivering a structured rehabilitation strategy in the ICU. However, the ward environment poses different challenges to the development of an integrated rehabilitation pathway. There is a need to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of structured rehabilitation strategies when delivered outside the ICU. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Physiotherapy and Optimised Enteral Nutrition In the post-acute phase of critical illness is a bi-centre, mixed methods feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT). 60 patients will be recruited from ICUs at two acute National Health Service Trusts and randomised on a 1:1 basis to receive either individualised physiotherapy and optimised nutrition post discharge from ICU (intervention) or standard care. The primary objective is to assess the acceptability of the intervention and feasibility of a future, multicentre RCT. The primary outcome measures, which will determine feasibility, are recruitment and retention rates, and intervention fidelity. Acceptability of the intervention will be evaluated through semistructured interviews of participants and staff. Secondary outcome measures include collecting baseline, clinical and outcome data to inform the power calculations of a future definitive trial. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained through the Wales Research and Ethics Committee 2 (24/WA/0050). We aim to disseminate the findings through international conferences, international peer-reviewed journals and social media. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06159868. Prospectively registered on 28 November 2023.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessEnteral NutritionMalnutritionPhysical Therapy ModalitiesCritical CareFeasibility StudiesHumansIntensive Care UnitsMulticenter Studies as TopicPatient DischargeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUnited KingdomExerciseIntensive Care UnitsNUTRITION & DIETETICSPhysical Therapy ModalitiesREHABILITATION MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID40147993
PMCPMC11956353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.