ArticleGenetics2025
The proximal enhancer of the snail gene mediates negative autoregulatory feedback in Drosophila melanogaster.
Article in Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inferring chromatin architecture at a single locus through probabilistic in situ DNA localization.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Coordinated active repression operates via transcription factor cooperativity and multiple inactive promoter states in a developing organism.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Autoregulatory feedback is a mechanism in which a gene product regulates its own expression, stabilizing gene activity amid noise and environmental changes. In Drosophila melanogaster, the gene snail encodes a key transcriptional repressor that regulates the expression of many genes during early embryogenesis, including its own expression. This study focuses on Snail occupancy at both distal and proximal enhancers of the snail gene to understand the cis-regulatory mechanisms involved in autoregulatory control. The coordinated action of these enhancers results in precisely constrained levels of snail expression during early embryogenesis. Using genome editing by CRISPR/Cas9, we found that deletion of each enhancer individually is compatible with embryonic viability under normal conditions. However, the double mutant is lethal, suggesting a functional interplay between the 2 enhancers. To gain further insight, we assayed snail gene expression levels in fixed embryos. Our results revealed that negative autoregulation of snail relies on the proximal enhancer. Moreover, increasing the affinity of binding sites for Dorsal, a transcriptional activator, in the proximal enhancer impaired this autoregulation, suggesting that Snail acts locally to counterbalance Dorsal's input. A mathematical model of snail autoregulatory control further supports our findings, reinforcing the view that the proximal enhancer mediates negative autoregulatory feedback, and implicating the distal enhancer in positive autoregulatory feedback. In summary, Snail's role at the proximal enhancer is pivotal for negative autoregulatory control and essential for balancing the activation mediated by the distal enhancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.