Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40147870›Full record

ArticleGenetics2025

The proximal enhancer of the snail gene mediates negative autoregulatory feedback in Drosophila melanogaster.

Leslie Dunipace, James M McGehee, Jihyun Irizarry, Angelike Stathopoulos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leslie DunipaceDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1739-6537
James M McGeheeDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9353-1235
Jihyun IrizarryDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3967-2288
Angelike StathopoulosDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6597-2036

Funding

Resource Component: Acquisition, maintenance and distribution of Drosophila stocksP40OD018537 · OD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Annette L. Parks · 2014 to 2026
$13.5M
Temporal control of cell patterning, signaling, and movement in early embryosR35GM118146 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI STATHOPOULOS, ANGELIKE · 2016 to 2025
$5.8M
National Institute of Health R35GM118146NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118146NIH HHS P40 OD018537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autoregulatory feedback is a mechanism in which a gene product regulates its own expression, stabilizing gene activity amid noise and environmental changes. In Drosophila melanogaster, the gene snail encodes a key transcriptional repressor that regulates the expression of many genes during early embryogenesis, including its own expression. This study focuses on Snail occupancy at both distal and proximal enhancers of the snail gene to understand the cis-regulatory mechanisms involved in autoregulatory control. The coordinated action of these enhancers results in precisely constrained levels of snail expression during early embryogenesis. Using genome editing by CRISPR/Cas9, we found that deletion of each enhancer individually is compatible with embryonic viability under normal conditions. However, the double mutant is lethal, suggesting a functional interplay between the 2 enhancers. To gain further insight, we assayed snail gene expression levels in fixed embryos. Our results revealed that negative autoregulation of snail relies on the proximal enhancer. Moreover, increasing the affinity of binding sites for Dorsal, a transcriptional activator, in the proximal enhancer impaired this autoregulation, suggesting that Snail acts locally to counterbalance Dorsal's input. A mathematical model of snail autoregulatory control further supports our findings, reinforcing the view that the proximal enhancer mediates negative autoregulatory feedback, and implicating the distal enhancer in positive autoregulatory feedback. In summary, Snail's role at the proximal enhancer is pivotal for negative autoregulatory control and essential for balancing the activation mediated by the distal enhancer.

Indexed as

Drosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEnhancer Elements, GeneticSnail Family Transcription FactorsTranscription FactorsAnimalsCRISPR-Cas SystemsEmbryonic DevelopmentFeedback, PhysiologicalGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHomeostasisNuclear ProteinsPhosphoproteinsdl protein, DrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsNuclear ProteinsPhosphoproteinsSnail Family Transcription Factorssna protein, DrosophilaTranscription Factorsautoregulatory feedbackcis-regulatory mechanismsDrosophila melanogasterFlyBasegene expression levelsshadow enhancerssnail

Identifiers

PMID40147870
PMCPMC12135202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.