ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2025
Implementing a national Dutch PEWS system in 12 hospitals with different contexts: opportunities, challenges and implications.
Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Performance of the Dutch Pediatric Early Warning Score: a nationwide study in academic, large teaching and general hospital contexts, using real-world data.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Article
- From Hidden Insights to Better Understanding: Physicians' Perspectives on Caregivers' Tacit Knowledge.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWorldwide, there is a large heterogeneity of Paediatric Early Warning Score (PEWS) systems to detect deterioration in hospitalised children timely. In the Netherlands, the Dutch PEWS was created to enhance national standardisation, incorporating a core set of vital signs and watcher signs with local adaptation strategies. The primary objective of this study was to determine factors for successful implementation. The secondary objectives were to assess the use and perceived value of local adaptation.
methodsIn a multicentre study, the Dutch PEWS was implemented in 12 hospitals with different contexts ranging from University Medical Centers to general hospitals. This mixed-methods evaluation study prospectively collected data following the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle. In preparation for implementation, local adaptation was executed, implementation strategies were formulated and baseline measurements were conducted. Post-implementation measures were performed 3, 6 and 9 months after implementation. In total, 1127 questionnaires and 171 interviews were completed with healthcare providers and 11 interviews and 3 member checks with project leaders. The protocol adherence percentage (PAP) was calculated for each hospital as an indicator for implementation.
resultsThe majority of the participants assessed the implementation and use of the Dutch PEWS positively. Important facilitators include reduced workload, increased confidence in achieving the objective and benefits related to utilisation on a national scale. Nationwide use facilitated further integration into training programmes and optimisation of electronic health record systems. At the same time, local adaptation was used in most hospitals and to varying extents. The overall PAP was 81% (±25%), ranging from 47% to 140%.
conclusionThis study demonstrates that successful implementation of PEWS systems is related to their design, adaptability to local contexts and nationwide utilisation. Moreover, nationwide use provides opportunities to evaluate the system across diverse contexts, thereby supporting broader implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.