ArticleActa biomaterialia2025
Development and calibration of digital twins for human skin growth in tissue expansion.
Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tissue expansion (TE), an essential technique in reconstructive surgery, leverages the growth of skin in response to stretch. However, human skin growth dynamics have not been evaluated in vivo. Previously, we quantified this process in a porcine model and developed a calibrated computational framework. Here, we create patient-specific finite element (FE) models of skin growth in TE using longitudinal 3D photos collected during TE treatment. These geometries enable Bayesian model calibration, accounting for uncertainties in boundary conditions, mechanical properties, and biological parameters. The framework incorporates prior knowledge from the porcine model as well as literature information on human skin mechanics. The likelihood function assesses alignment between predicted and observed geometries, and predicted and observed skin growth. To efficiently sample the posterior distribution, we use Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) with Gaussian process surrogates, reducing computational cost. This pipeline is demonstrated in five TE cases. Post-calibration, FE models closely match 3D photos, with errors below 2 mm on average. Notably, Bayesian calibration collapses the critical stretch parameter posterior distribution. This study presents the first in vivo measurement of human skin growth, confirming that FE models accurately capture TE in the clinical setting, and that porcine-derived parameters provide a strong prior for Bayesian calibration in the clinical case. These findings support the development of personalized digital twins for TE, enhancing surgical planning and outcomes. Statement of significance Tissue expansion (TE) is widely used in reconstructive surgery, particularly for breast reconstruction and pediatric defect repair. While skin growth has been quantified in animal models, this work provides the first clinical measurement of human skin growth during TE. We employ a Bayesian calibration framework to create personalized finite element (FE) simulations for five TE cases. The initial FE model is constructed from a patient's 3D photo taken at the start of treatment. Then, uncertainties in mechanical and biological parameters as well as boundary conditions are sampled and the model run. We use Gaussian process surrogates to replace the FE model. Calibration of parameters is done with 3D photos taken longitudinally during TE. This pipeline for skin digital twins can enhance personalized TE procedures, optimizing outcomes and reducing complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.