ArticleVirologica Sinica2025
Development and immunoprotection assessment of novel vaccines for avian infectious bronchitis virus.
Article in Virologica Sinica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction and modification of a low-copy plasmid-based infectious clone for GI-19 genotype IBV via Red/ET recombineering: A simplified and efficient reverse genetics system for coronavirus.Poultry science · 2026Article
- From Gut to Shot: Microbiome-Guided Strategies to Improve Vaccine Responses in Food Animals.Vaccines · 2026Review
- Assessment of Functional Antibody Responses Induced by Tembusu Virus Vaccines Using a Blocking ELISA.Viruses · 2026Article
- A recombinant Newcastle disease virus-vectored multi-epitope vaccine confers protection against QX-like infectious bronchitis virus in chickens.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Immunoinformatics-driven design of a conserved RNA-dependent RNA polymerase-based multi-epitope vaccine against avian infectious bronchitis virus.Veterinary world · 2026Article
- Farm animal coronaviruses: the solution is in vaccines.The veterinary quarterly · 2025Review
- The S2 Glycoprotein Subunit Determines Intestinal Tropism in Infectious Bronchitis Virus.Microorganisms · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infectious bronchitis (IB), a highly contagious acute respiratory disease affecting avian species, poses significant challenges to poultry production. The causative agent, infectious bronchitis virus (IBV), exhibits a high mutation rate, leading to limited cross-protection by existing vaccines. This necessitates the development of novel vaccines. This study, based on preliminary investigations conducted by our research team, identified six potential strains (PYG QX1, ZQF QX2, FQH QX3, LYZ QX4, XXX QX5, and CSL strains) for vaccine development. Previous pathogenicity test and serum cross-neutralization experiments conducted in this study have demonstrated that the FQH QX3 strain exhibited the weakest pathogenicity and the broadest spectrum of serum neutralization, while the CSL strain showed the highest pathogenicity and was the most challenging to neutralize, posing the greatest difficulty in prevention and control. Subsequently, we constructed and rescued recombinant vaccine candidates, H120-FQH QX3, and H120-CSL, expressing the S1 and N proteins of the FQH QX3 and CSL strains, respectively. Immunization protection experiments indicated that the H120-CSL recombinant vaccine candidate exhibited the most effective immune protection, making it a promising candidate for further study and evaluation as a recombinant vaccine. The S1 and N genes of the CSL strain demonstrated strong immunogenicity, making them potential candidate antigen genes for future vaccine development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.