ReviewBritish journal of haematology2025
The wider perspective: Barriers and recommendations for transfusion support for patients with sickle cell disease in low- and middle-income countries.
Review in British journal of haematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence of transfusion-transmissible infections and associated sociodemographic risk factors among blood donors at a tertiary care hospital in Lahore, Pakistan.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- From policy to practice: World Health Organization's contribution to safer blood transfusions in Africa for sickle cell management - a review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Proactive management to improve outcomes of high-risk pregnancy in people with sickle cell disease.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025Review
- The wider perspective: Barriers and recommendations for transfusion support for patients with sickle cell disease in low- and middle-income countries.British journal of haematology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Globally, sickle cell disease (SCD) is the most common inherited haemoglobinopathy. The highest burden of SCD is encountered in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), most of which lack the resources to contend with the disease. There is a marked divide between care for individuals with SCD in high-income countries (HICs) versus LMICs, whereby the few disease-modifying therapies and curative regimens are only accessible to those in HICs. As such, blood transfusion remains central to the emergent treatment and prevention of complications of SCD. However, there are a myriad of related challenges in LMICs, which have impeded efforts to treat patients with SCD effectively. In addition to blood safety and availability, examples that impact SCD specifically include capabilities to detect and/or manage red blood cell alloimmunization, capacity for automated red cell exchange, limited immunohematology, suboptimal quality oversight with a lack of safeguards to prevent transfusion of incompatible blood and limited or absent post-transfusion surveillance to detect and/or manage transfusion-associated adverse events. Consequently, clinical practices that are otherwise regarded as standard of care in HICs remain the exception in LMICs, highlighting disparities in care. A multifaceted approach that prioritizes transfusion support in LMICs is needed to improve care for patients with SCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.